User talk:Rahuljain78

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  The Mi ke •Wassup doc? 09:56, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Radia Tapes
Hi Rahulain78 - I noticed you have been removing quite a lot of material from the Radia tapes controversy and adding text which does not seem to meet our policy on neutrality, ie. it is very flattering towards Niira Radia. It would be good if you would explain why you wish to make these changes on the article's talk page otherwise, your changes may be reverted.-- Kateshortforbob talk  11:30, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Radia tapes controversy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Ioannes Pragensis (talk) 11:43, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Radia tapes controversy, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Radia tapes controversy was changed by Rahuljain78 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876856 on 2011-02-02T12:44:58+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Radia tapes controversy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Ioannes Pragensis (talk) 13:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pradip Baijal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ashlonerider (talk) 08:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia only for promoting particular people and a point of view, and persistent disruptive editing, including repeated removal of content without explanation. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:23, 4 February 2011 (UTC)