User talk:Rahuuldethe

Keratoconus
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I've been reading the changes you've been making on the keratoconus page with interest. Some points to note, however: Please also understand that this article is the subject of an active dispute, making it particularly critical to discuss any such changes on the article's talk page. Please start a section there on Rosenthal so that the active parties may discuss the changes. Regards, &mdash; BillC talk 18:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It's 'keratoconus', not 'kerataconus'.
 * 2) You added a lot of material about one Perry Rosenthal and his work in scleral lenses. The article now reads something like an advertisement for Rosenthal. Was this what you intended? WP:WEIGHT is an important aspect of Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view, and the many mentions of Rosenthal's work, unless it is really, really groundbreaking, probably constitutes a violation of this policy. If his design is for a scleral lens made from more permeable material, then it probably does not warrant this level of coverage.
 * 3) You haven't added any citations for your additions. Be aware that uncited material added to Wikipedia may be challenged and removed.
 * 4) You describe Rosenthal's scleral lens as 'new'. Scleral lenses have been around for as long as there have been contact lenses.
 * 5) Please avoid contractions such as '&' in formal writing.
 * 6) You say "This breakthrough will reduce the need for corneal transplant", yet Rosenthal's paper was in 1994, fifteen years ago.