User talk:RainBowAndArrow/Archive 1 (Pre-Cluebot)

World In Conflict
jeez, i put the table up so people can know about what sort of tactical aids are in the game. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, giving information. all i'm doing is putting up information on World In Conflict. it seems everytime i do something to the World In Conflict wikipage, ur always taking huge chunks of it off. Of course wikipedia is not a game manual. The table being up there doesn't make it a game guide or manual. A game manual is one of those from Prima Game Guides of Brady Game Guides. get over it! Theres nothing wrong with putting a table of tactical aids onto wikipedia. It helps people know what World In Conflict is all about! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kliu1 (talk • contribs)

some guy redid the whole website, i think its alright, but may need some clearer designations. You might wanna help me with that. I think some of the order of contents is a bit out of place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kliu1 (talk • contribs) 21:27, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

World In Conflict
Mate, i'm puting the recommended retail price which is the official pricing given from sierra entertainment. Its been confirmed by most of the shops and i have the official link which massive and sierra entertainment state the official rrp. I'm tryin to give people an idea of how much the price is. Shops dont overprice, they either underprice the rrp or remain the same as the rrp. I'm providing information to the public, alot of people get their information from wikipedia. I'm tryin to give them accurate information about the pricing of the game. Theres nothing wrong with that. --kliu1 04:29, 24 August 2007

Resistance is AWESOME
Resistance: Fall of Man is an awesome game, and everybody I know who played this game thought it was a Killer Application, and that page is all opinion so who made you the decider, and that is a real word, of what game is awesome and what games suck like Gears of War. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Awesomeness (talk • contribs)
 * Many people, myself included, believe Resistance: Fall of Man is a killer application and does excel in many ways. These people haven't soley, but mainly, bought this system to play this game. If you will kindly go to the review of this game at ign.com you will see that they, too, believe it to be the first Playstation 3 killer application, and as you should know this is a respectable source of info. Bitch. Remember to go to the review of the game at ign.com. Bitch. Concerning your comment about Pro Evolution Soccer, it nullifies your whole argument, due to the fact that it's shit.--Dr.Awesomeness 23:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, if you think the article is subjective, as you said concerning the PES game, then what makes you the decider on what games are in and out, if it is said to be so subjective. Also, you say that you trust gamespot above all others who have reviewed games. The Resistance game has gotten the same review from gamespot as Liberty City Stories, which is also considered a Killer App. Another Wikipedia page states that the game has sold over 2 million units, which is more that half of the number of PS3s that have been bought. This is a larger percentage than the numer of Gears of Wars that have been sold with the 360. There were also 10 million sales of 360s before the release of Gears of War. This number has not drastically improved as you have said a Killer App should do. So you seem to have something against Resistance because it got the same review as GTA: LCS and you never changed that one for the PSP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Awesomeness (talk • contribs)
 * I am not speaking of sales. I am speaking of percentage, much harder to obtain than sales, and that percentage says more than half of the people who own PS3's own Resistance: Fall of Man. Gears of War sold 3 million copies. The XBOX 360 sold 11 million copies before the release of gears of War. This means that gears of war was not the main reason these people bought the console, which is what you say a Killer App is. Gears of War is owned by a little more than 25%.--Dr.Awesomeness 17:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Speedily-deleting spam
Please note that 'spam' is not a criterion for speedy deletion. In the case of Tropical Puzzle there is a speedy-deletion criterion you could use: ('consists of nothing but links elsewhere'). Thanks. --ais523 11:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Brennus Shield
I notice you tagged Brennus Shield for speedy deletion; there are a couple of problesm with this. First "taken from the French wiki" is not one of the reasons for speedy deletion listed here. Please only tag articles that fall into one of the Criteria for Speedy Deletion. Second we actively encourage people to take material from the other language Wikis, translate them and add them here. Thank, Gwernol 11:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Not to worry, we all make mistakes while learning (see my early contributions for plenty of examples :-). This is in fact a great example of why we should be careful about speedying articles - this is turning into a good article that adds to Wikipedia - I never knew about the Brennus Shield before, now I do. I would have tagged this article as, that way it would have been marked as requiring translation but not added to the speedy deletion category. Best, Gwernol 13:37, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Diablo II: Lord of Destruction Patch History
Diablo II: Lord of Destruction Patch History has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might not be verifiable. Please review Verifiability for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing sources.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 06:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Re:Battlefield 2 Points
I have posted a reply to your message on my talk page. --LorianTC 16:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

BSB
i don't really know to use a talk page so i'll just say it here (i hope its the right place). boyband is not a genre of music...it is a stupid term given to male groups. if you are going to use that as a genre for BSB, i fully expect you to add it all the other late 90's "boybands" and also add it to the Beach Boys, Beatles, Eagles, and countless other male pop bands and groups. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pompertown (talk • contribs)
 * but the BSB play their own instruments as well...you're just basing it on what they did 7-8 years ago. you would really be surprised to learn about what they've become... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pompertown (talk • contribs)

Test Drive Unlimited Talk Page
Hi, I got ur message about not erasing things like I did on Test drive unlimited talk page, and I wanted to say that i deleted it because i asked the question.. I put the question about the people deleting the info, and i saw it was already asked, so i deleted it.. sorry that i wasnt logged in, im new.. and sorry if this isnt the way to write messages on wiki. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.146.137.174 (talk • contribs)

AoM
Do you play AoM? Please reply. my reply section is to be the lowest. 82.12.86.64 08:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC) AooM 08:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

David Russell Apartments
Hi Falcon. I don't think this article qualifies as "patent nonsense", and spam is not yet a criterion for speedy deletion, so I have removed your speedy tag, and prodded the article instead. JPD (talk) 11:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Cult of the Dead Cow ASCII art
There's nothing wrong with the size of the ASCII art in the article. --Myles Long 15:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

PSPUpdates
You don't seem to realise that PSPUpdates is not respected by the communtiy as much as say MaxConsole.net and I feel that you are also having a point of view on the fact that you say PSPUpdates is okay to have as a link.

[personal attack removed] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.241.73.150 (talk) 16:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC).

Sims 2 Cheat Bugs
I see that back in June of 2006, you took out the section on bugs related to cheats for The Sims 2. However, since cheats are used frequently by players, shouldn't there be some way of warning users what the risks of using certain cheats are?

The two I added were: Door-Clone Glitch and Boddler Glitch. I've been placing the documentation on my own personal Wiki site about the Boddler Glitch, which causes the secondary condition | BI-SWILS. It's part of a condition in the game that is more significant, which is documented | here.

If there is any way that Wikipedia can use this information, they are welcome to it. A link back would be appreciated, however.--The Bulldozer 03:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedians by alma mater: University of Limerick
It has been requested that this category be populated. Please ask users who fall within this category to add themselves to it.

You seem to qualify. You can accept or decline the invitation. Whichever you wish. 13:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Resident Evil 4
I noticed that you added a source for the RE4's PC port, including a link. I just wanted to say... THANK YOU. For what seems like a MONTH some guy has kept adding in the paragraph and adding the paragraph, but consistently refused to put any sort of source in. Thanks to your addition, I no longer have to sit on the article and watch for it. A million thanks! Ex-Nintendo Employee 00:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

North Hollywood shootout
Thank you, thank you, thank you for your recent cleanup of this article. It looks worlds better. Homefill 16:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

User:Maniac20
Just report this guy for 3RR. I literally can't be fucked to keep up with this crap. Try and get those images deleted if you can. I made a note at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games to try and attract more attention. - hahnch e n 21:23, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Hannibal Rising (film)‎
I think your deletion of some external links is questionable. I am opposed to linkspam and have reverted much of it myself. But to delete a link because it's not "official" is ambiguous and possibly unnecessary. What is an "official" website? With a film, for example, does "official" only mean the official website for the film? That would drastically limit the number of acceptable external links for most Wikipedia pages. I don't delete links that are not intended primarily for advertising. Even IMDb pages have advertising, but links to IMDb are quite legitimate. If a link goes to a website that has little or nothing about the subject and is loaded with advertising, that's linkspam. But one of your deletions was to a legitimate review of the film; it may have had some advertising, but no more than IMDb.

I'm leaving your edits alone. But I think you need to be cautious about what is "official" and what is not. Ward3001 16:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

I am responsible for some of the review links that have been deleted. I am not changing your edits, however [What Should Be Linked] states "Sites with other meaningful, relevant content ... such as reviews" should be linked, and "For albums, movies, books, and other creative works, links to professional reviews." should be considered. Evanmit 19 July 2007

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Locoroco.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Locoroco.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

PGR4 Car List
Hi there. Thanks for telling me the rules about the info. It won't happen again.

MightyJordan.

Fair use disputed for Image:Darkness cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Darkness cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Polyhedron
Hi, thanks for the response.

The thing about polyhedra is that they are not just a cut-and-dried family of geometric shapes. They are mathematical objects - the word was coined by Greek mathematicians over 2,000 years ago, and pretty much any book on polyhedra is de facto a mathematical textbook.

The definition given at the very start is just that - a starting-point. It is also extremely imprecise, which is the reason why mathematicians have been arguing about it pretty much ever since. One can regard "polyhedron" as an ambiguous word which has come to mean many different things, with meanings changing and being added to progressively over the centuries as our understanding developed. The more important of these are introduced on the polyhedron page. I do indeed think it important to make this plasticity of meaning clear in the introduction. Branko Gr&uuml;nbaum's remark is well known among the cognoscenti, in part because it summarises the situation so well and in part because it was this remark that re-invigorated the modern theories of polyhedra and polytopes, especially of abstract polytopes.

You say, "Also, no sources." Yet this ambiguity of meaning is discussed in Cromwell (referenced) and of course by Gr&uuml;nbaum (also referenced), so I do not understand where your remark is coming from. (AIUI there is no need to cite sources inline unless a statement is contentious, and at least among the experts the statements you removed are well appreciated).

You also say that the phrases "Oft-quoted" and "seldom respected" are both pov statements. I don't know what "pov" means, but I understand your point about sources for these. I have no handy reference - beyond the painfully slow collection of papers quoting Gr&uuml;nbaum's remark as I re-read them, I cannot support these value judgements - and some of the context which shaped my phrasing may even be unpublished. So while "oft-quoted" can in time be supported (by multiple citations amounting to 'often'), I am not sure if the "seldom-respected" bit can be referenced (though it is well enough discussed among the experts). So whether these phrases need modifying must depend on how keen a policy enforcer you are, and where you draw the line between policy interpretation and accuracy of statement.

Sorry to be so long-winded, but there is actually a great deal of research and knowledge behind those few short remarks! -- Steelpillow 14:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Following your further edit, I have restored Gr&uuml;nbaum's remark because it has a sufficiently iconic status among polyhedronists, as the starting-shot of the new order, that I believe it deserves to stay - and where better place that the intro. Along with this I have tried to rewrite the intro so that it is informative without being personalised.  Finally, I have removed the "written in a personal style" tag because I believe that the paragraph we are discussing is/was an isolated example. -- Steelpillow 17:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

The Orange Box
I reverted your edit removing the Russian release date from the Orange Box article. You were right, it shouldn't be there unless it's in english. Sorry for the confusion. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 19:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

World in Conflict
Your removal of the Taiwanese (republic of China) release date, and the reason stating that it was not relevant was racist. How can you say that it is not relevant. It was released in Taiwan on that day, how come other countries listed on there you wont say its not relevant. I placed the date back on. Please have respect for other countries. (Kliu1 04:27, 11 November 2007 (UTC))

Assassin's Creed Wiki
I noticed you edited the Assassin's Creed page. I would like to invite you to come share your knowledge of the game with us at the Assassin's Creed Wiki at Wikia @ http://assassinscreed.wikia.com/ Cheers. -- JoePlay —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.107.177.236 (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Props and Comment
Thanks for raising your intellectual standards my friend. It's always nice to meet similar friends around the world. I just wanted to say thanks for the help and working on Wiki. And, as a, sigh, American, I'll be the first to agree with you that America isn't anything special, but there are, kinda sorta, still a few decent ones around. If you look hard enough. lol. Take care and cheers! Aceholiday (talk) 18:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Just browsing your user page. I was impressed with showing exactly who you are and what you believe. Hopefully, not too many, uh, Cro-Magnons (my word for more primitive thinking) give you a hard time about it. I'm not new to wiki at all but I've tried to avoid the 'myspace' type approach of warring on people's user pages. Following Obama's Nevada loss last night I'm a little discontent about November. I've been reading about socialist ideas and such and think I've found more of a home in that territory as well, even if it makes me a 'commie red hiding under every bed...' So if you've never met an American Socialist, now you have. haha. Cheers man! Aceholiday (talk) 13:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Looking for help to improve Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
Hi, I noticed that you edited the article Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare recently and I am just letting you know that I plan on working on the article over the next few weeks in order to bring it up to Featured Article status. If you have time, please consider helping out with the article by improving the referencing, content, and other miscellaneous activities in order for the article to meet the standards set out at WP:WIAFA. Thanks for your time! Gary King (talk) 05:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Console Infobox order
Your fanboyism is showing! xenocidic (talk) 15:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Very much so. Stop with the unwarranted edits to put PlayStation 3 and Blu-Ray and all the other bias information first. As long as it is listed, that's all that is required for a Wikipedia entry. Save fanboy firestarting for Gamespot forums, NOT Wikipedia. Wrel (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 15:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


 * -sigh- See your talk pages, and, y'know, the alphabet. Fin©™ 15:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't feel that everything should be alphabetized. Mass Effect : Xbox 360 version is *released* and the Windows version is *upcoming*. Shadowrun : the X360 is the primary platform - the Vista servers have been discontinued. and I still feel the press release order should be used especially when it's being used as a citation. xenocidic (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * meh. Leave Mass Effect and Shadowrun for the reasons above and do what you will do the rest, if you press release argument doesn't move you. xenocidic (talk) 16:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Doesn't have to do with what platform I "Like" it has to do with an article being informative and accurate. xenocidic (talk) 16:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Just because I'm the only one arguing it doesn't mean I'm wrong. Not sure why being alphabetical is so important, especially when it makes little or no sense. If you have a bunch of books, on a bookshelf, do you put them alphabetically, or do you arrange them from largest to smallest book? xenocidic (talk) 16:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Point of order: It's spelled rationale. xenocidic (talk) 16:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah ok, so you're just obsessive-compulsive to a point. Anyways, have fun, I give up. xenocidic (talk) 16:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Stating a fact is not a personal attack. ("I myself have books alphabetical"). anyways, Like I said, I'm done. cheers. xenocidic (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't say you had OCD, I said you are obsessive compulsive to a point, i.e. fixation on alphabetization. Personally I am obsessive compulsive about things as well (my Xbox 360 gamercard for example) and I don't consider it to be an insult, per se. Sorry if you took it as such and please accept my sincere apologies if I mistook your love for alphabetization for fanboyism. xenocidic (talk) 16:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Apology
No problem. I'll admit I was being a little combative as well, so neither of us is without fault =). Take it easy. xenocidic (talk) 12:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Mario & Sonic
Stop removing the link. Sega did not publish the game in Japan, so this is Nintendo's official website for the game. If you want to be technical, the guideline allows this. I have brought it up on the talkpage, so I won't remove it for now (although I have every right to if I wanted).  TJ   Spyke   20:34, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. I think a lot of people either don't know that or forgot since Nintendo is only publishing it in Japan (maybe the rest of Asia, I don't know). I raised the question about what to do if a game is published by different companies, should we include the official site that each of the publishers set up? There are many occasions where a game will be published by a different company depending on the region (even first party, Nintendo chose to let Atlus publish "Cubivore" outside of Japan for example).  TJ   Spyke   21:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Smile From Kurowoofwoof111


Kurowoofwoof111 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Thanks for helping on Time Crisis 4