User talk:Rain Forest

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Rain Forest! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 03:26, Friday, June 9, 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Rain Forest! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 03:27, Friday, June 9, 2017 (UTC)

Question
I think we shouldn't put Bobby under Mino's main biography it's enough in Discography page. Why u edited back? Bobby's wiki doesn't even mention Mino or Mobb in his main bio explanation page. Do the same. Nava9099 (talk) 10:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Winner Everyday Sample.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Winner Everyday Sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello Rain Forest. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Treasure (band), but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rain Forest. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.  scope_creep Talk  10:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Scope creep, I'm quite shocked that someone has accused me of being paid to edit when I wasn't even aware that people actually pay others to edit things under Wikipedia. I simply created an account to contribute towards developing existing articles while adhering to the wikipedia guidelines. Although thanks for the explanation on 'paid contribution disclosure', I've learnt something new today.Rain Forest (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Rain Forest. That's cool. Crack on.  scope_creep Talk  08:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Filmography section
Hi there, please do not add Korean to the table, majority if not all of the title in the table are wikilinked which is more than sufficient. Furthermore, your logic on adding original title doesn't make any sense. What if there is the person starred in Chinese drama or other-language drama that isn't Korean? Doing so, will only clutter the table with unnecessary information. Please also note that Wikipedia is not a directory nor is it a search engine, majority of the readers don't need such information, if you added because you find it convenient then sorry you're in the wrong place. Btw, don't forgot you're in English Wikipedia. I do know your edit is good faith edit however please don't add such unnecessary information. Only add Korean to certain songs in the discography section if applicable which is often not wikilinked otherwise, please don't add them as mentioned above. Thanks you for your cooperation.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  10:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Somi Dumb Dumb Sample.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Somi Dumb Dumb Sample.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Jeon So-mi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  04:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Your recent editing history at Itzy discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Ss  112   03:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Removal of information
Please stop removing information from articles, notably the listicles from Aespa and Enhypen's pages. Consult to talk page and ask whether you can remove the information suddenly. Refrain from doing this in the future as your account may face consequences. ReVeluv02 (talk) 02:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)


 * @ReVeluv02 The purpose of this accounts creation is to remove content that is deemed "not notable" by the Wikipedia Guidelines or don't adhere to it. While it is true the size of the removal was larger than expected due to all the citations, the significance of it was still small considering, as mentioned earlier, the notability. If you visit pages that follow these guidelines and have been reviewed / graded by users as "GA", "A" and "B" (e.g. Song Joong-ki, BoA, Bong Joon-ho) you'll realize they don't just add every single list they've been mentioned in, only the notable ones get listed (like Forbes Korea Power Celebrity 40). Rain Forest (talk) 03:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Lightoil (talk) 02:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Not Vandalism
The you reverted was not vandalism. Please do not call edits that are not vandalism vandalism thanks. Lightoil (talk) 03:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Prior editor has already explicitly stated the reason for its removal; if it's still added despite the explanation without proper sources, then yes, it's considered vandalism to a certain extent. First and foremost, Wikipedia's guidelines are to be enforced at all times, information from blog posts are not considered reliable per WP:KO/RS and WP:BLPSPS. Previous revision is properly sourced from reliable sources, hence that version remains more appropriate. Thanks. Rain Forest (talk) 03:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:VAND that is just disruptive editing not vandalism. Lightoil (talk) 03:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)