User talk:Raindreamer

OK it's done  Jimfbleak . talk . 16:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Sbrools ( talk .  contribs ) 01:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * 2) Make your case on the article's .

Neil Smith (politician)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Neil Smith (politician), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Neil Smith (politician) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''political also-ran. Insufficient independent coverage, not notable. A7''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Neil Smith (politician), please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Neil Smith (politician) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lisa McClelland
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lisa McClelland, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Orphan, one hit wonder news story. Not grounds for a BLP. (One event)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 23:43, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Stopps v. Just Ladies Fitness for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stopps v. Just Ladies Fitness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stopps v. Just Ladies Fitness until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tiptoety talk 02:45, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)