User talk:Raintheone/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
--Fuhghettaboutit 01:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Zzkelly.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Zzkelly.PNG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 14:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Rebecca jerams
Hi. I'm sure you want to protect the page you created, but the page has no apparent notability (see the Notability (music) guideline), and you aren't allowed to remove the speedy delete template. If you want to contest the article being flagged for speedy deletion, put up a "hangon" template like the instructions in the box say. --Jackhorkheimer 00:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Peggy Snow
Peggy Snow has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review What Wikipedia is not and Notability for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 03:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:01 01 04EMMERDALE15.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:01 01 04EMMERDALE15.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 22:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Penelope
No more articles about Penelope Jones, please, or you may be banned from editing. Deb 18:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Penelope Jones
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Penelope Jones is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Penelope Jones saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 18:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

January 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Alexfusco5 02:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Keiron Hobbs has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.   Compwhiz II ( Talk )( Contribs )  18:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

.....
....What? Really, please learn to use proper English i couldn't understand you.   Compwhiz II ( Talk )( Contribs )  18:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * People make mistakes   Compwhiz II ( Talk )( Contribs )  18:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Repost of Leah Patterson-Baker
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Leah Patterson-Baker, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Leah Patterson-Baker was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD) To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Leah Patterson-Baker, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Clare Bates has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 21:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Dot Cotton
It does say that, that piece of information has been there for well over a year, and has been verified by other people on the project long before you came along. It's the jounalist's view on what makes a gay icon, not mine. The link went dead on the free site, ive provided the same page, but it's now a pay per view site, so you dont get the full article. Regardless, you shouldnt just remove references when they go dead. It happens all the time, but it doesnt mean the information is no longer usable. This is why we have access dates listed in references. Here's what to do when links go dead Citing sources Gung  adin  21:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but you're wrong. It does mention Dot Cotton, Tiffany Mitchell too, and various other soap characters. How can you even comment when you haven't fully read the article? Of course one person's opinion isnt fact, and that's why the article Dot Cotton says she has been "labelled" as a gay icon. That she's been labelled as a gay icon is factual, because she has, in the article that's been referenced. Every single word in a newspaper article is about filling text space, so what's you point? This article happens to be solely about pink pin-ups and gay icons, so oddly enough, the journalist is filling text space with supposed gay icons, including Dot. Gung adin  22:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well if I did, it would be perfectly acceptable to do so, because i'm not giving my opinion, i'm giving the opinion of a journalist. Dot clearly isnt your gay icon Raintheone, and I do sympathise as this is obviously an important issue for you, but maybe you should be taking this up with the Evening Standard instead? Perhaps you could start a petition to have Dot denounced as a gay icon or something? Would be a great help would that :)-- Gung adin  22:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Leah Patterson-Baker
As explained in the deletion summary, the article was deleted because a community consensus had been reached regarding whether this (and other Home and Away bios) merited their own article. Please see Articles for deletion/Brad Armstrong (Home and Away) for the related discussion. With kind regards, nancy  (talk) 09:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No, it is not set in stone forever. The situation is that if a recreation of the article is "substantially identical" to the one deleted as the result of the deletion discussion the the new article can be (and likely will) be speedily deleted again under the G4 criteria as "recreation of deleted material". I have reviewed the original deletion discussion and you are quite right to highlight sources/references as one of the key issues as the consensus was that the article(s) should be deleted because of "no verifiable sources showing real-world notability". So.... if the new article addresses these concerns there is still a possibility that it might get speedily deleted but if it was you would probably have grounds for taking it to deletion review. Kind regards,  nancy  (talk) 07:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Maddy Young
If you check the diffs in the article history between your edit and mine, you'll notice all the information you included is still there. I didn't remove it, just reworded it. The Manual of Style on fiction articles says plot summary should be written in present, not past tense, hence the change. We're all working towards the same end here - the improvement of articles on Wikipedia - so there's no need to throw around unfounded accusations of WP:OWN. Frickative (talk) 10:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sincere apologies for coming across as touchy and thank you very much for the compliment. I think I definitely took your message the wrong way, and that's entirely my own fault for trying to use the internet on zero sleep! Happy editing :) Frickative (talk) 21:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Home and Away
Hi. Of course, I agree that articles on long-term characters on the show should stay (e.g. [{Alf Stewart]], Sally Fletcher), because those characters clearly have real-world notability simply because they are such long-running characters. But I don't think recurring guest characters, or those who spend about 2 months on the show, have the requisite notability. - Mark 02:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Leah Patterson
Hey there, Ive found a source for Leah for you It's a book called "Super Aussie Soaps: Behind the Scenes of Australia's Best Loved TV"

Page 263 talks about Leah Poulos arriving in Summer Bay with an army of Greek relatives. It says for the new millennium Summer Bay was finally evolving into a multi cultural community. Then there's more about her on page 265 about her falling pregnant and having a big fat Greek wedding. There's more on page 271 talking about her being pregnant and having braces on her teeth, handing over a surrogate baby etc. These kind of things can be quoted and used for commentary and sources, which is good if you want to recreate the page and stop it being deleted again. have a look through the google book search, all references of Leah should be highlighted :) Gung  adin  00:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Hollyoaks characters
Before you move any characters off the minor and recurring characters page, please ensure they meet the notability guidelines at WP:FICTION. [Jam] [talk] 11:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Corrie
So, are we going to work together with the Corrie articles like you asked? you could start by adding yourself to the participants list on WikiProject By the way, i would prefer it if you left messages for me on my talk page rather than in my archives, that way ill recieve the new message immediately, Thank You --Dodgechris (talk) 10:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Carmella
Hi there. I'll certainly have a look when I get home. But if a user is persistently removing valid revisions, warn them on their talk page. If it continues, then go for a block. I'll be more help when i get home and on a proper computer rather than this ancient thing i'm using now! Ged UK (talk) 14:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi again. I've put the page back on my watchlist. I think your edits make a great improvement to the article. Ged UK (talk) 16:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LoveisWicked.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:LoveisWicked.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Congrats!
After seeing the improvements you made to the article Becky Granger I'd just like to say you've done a really good job! Alex250P (talk) 00:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Graeme Proctor.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Graeme Proctor.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

re: Flo Rida - Right Round
Understood.... I reverted because I've had to remove her name from several places today where it just did not belong. Rap/sung collaborations are a given these days but all artists aren't given "featured" status automatically, ya know? Putting her name within the text of the article (if we can get a source that'd be great) - perhaps as a "collaborator" or the singer of the hook - that's cool.... but I don't think her name should be in the infobox as "featured" and I also removed her from the "Hot 100 number-ones" 2009 list and in some succession boxes. All worldwide record charts I've seen list Flo Rida's name only so I think that's how we should keep it here also. - eo (talk) 18:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * P.S. I did comment on the article's talk page - probably best to copy/move this conversation there also so there isn't a constant back-and-forth with the artist credit. - eo (talk) 18:07, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Michelle Connor
Do you remember the whole baby swap storyline? Well when Michelle was confessing everything to Steve she told him that she was with Dean for a year then split up and explained all the dates but how they stuck through thick and thin etc. And then when Steve and Michell split the first time round in June 2008 and she brought JD back she mentioned that she had dated him for a year about 12/13 years ago. I think the baby swap storyline episode was around January 2008. :) Alex250P (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Haha, thanks I'm known for it :D. And yeah that's a good idea, maybe just condense the actual storyline section and add to the development. And thanks as well I try and do my best the wikiproject. Alex250P (talk) 17:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah! You've done really well, I just think that the relationship section could be expanded just a tiny bit more, I will do that however and the storyline section that you named 'Early Plots' I think that could be fleshed out a little more, especially her whole relationship with Steve which just seems to be glazed over in the article, and personally, I'd love to work on Maria Connor, I've already done alot of work but alot more could be done. Alex250P (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah it does make sense :L, I understand what your saying, I've added a bit on the development section on Maria, mostly about her relationship with Liam but it's hard to find sources on the internet, I've been looking round and not much dates back to 2000, we'll just have to keep looking aye :/ Alex250P (talk) 22:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Which Next?
Hey Raintheone, now that we've nearly made Michelle Connor a perfect article which one do you want to focus on next? :) Alex250P (talk) 17:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, I agree with Rosie there is alot to write about in the development section such as her goth phase etc. do you agree? Alex250P (talk) 19:26, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh, good point. There is a little more information in there but to be honest, not much. Maybe we could try doing Ken but I looked earlier and the only problem is there isn't much that hasn't been said already in the article. Anyway I'll speak tomorrow as the girls are screaming for their daddy :L Alex250P (talk) 20:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Your edits
Hi, and thanks for your contributions. I noticed that you linked some dates recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an temporary Arbcom injunction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements, although this is no suggestion from me that you are in breach whatsoever. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Cindy Cunningham.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Cindy Cunningham.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Peripitus (Talk) 01:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Becky
Oh **** did I not undo it :| sorry, I was just seeing how it would look I meant to click cancel :S Sorry haha Alex250P (talk) 01:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Corrie Infoboxes
Is it just me or has the text in the infoboxes been made smaller?? Alex250P (talk) 11:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry but I used Wiki allot when I first started watching certain programs to get an idea on a characters past and backgrounds so I could have more of an understanding of past storylines now if I find if an article has been a bit vague I write a bit more so people will know about the storylines I don't think anything I have written has been as pointless as "Hannah ate her cornflakes"

90.197.134.240 (talk) 20:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Reply
That was actually a screen-shot from Hollyoaks. How was that vandalism? Encase you haven't noticed, all of the other articles are getting things like (half-brother) changed to just (half) since stating brother is not needed as it's in the sibling part. I removed that picture because basically it's not a very good one. And changing the duration from 2005–2009 to 2005–09 was simply because I'm trying to improve articles to make them like EastEnders ones.  Who niverse 93  talk?  11:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Well thanks, to be honest I was thinking about this earlier and I began to wonder if I should remove the website from images from that site. The Hannah Ashworth article is probably the best Hollyoaks article due to its reception, sources etc. Glad we sorted that out anyway :)  Who niverse 93  talk?  20:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Hollyoaks characters: reply
I would definitely be interested in a Hollyoaks Wikiproject. I actually was thinking about it last night, wondering how all other UK soaps have them except Hollyoaks. Looking at EastEnders articles, and then Hollyoaks ones, there is a massive difference. The Hollyoaks pages do have the potential to be as good as the EastEnders ones, there just hasn't been as much work and research etc. I think a Hollyoaks Wikiproject would be the right step to go to improve the articles anyway. Thanks for bringing it up anyway. :)  Who niverse 93  talk?  14:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah that's fine, I've just this minute figured out how so I'll get it done.  Who niverse 93  talk?  14:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know, I think you will have to put your name down to support it. WikiProject Council/Proposals/Hollyoaks  Who niverse 93  talk?  14:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah that's good, only thing, I've changed the opening so it says:

Nancy Anne Hayton (previously Dean) is a fictional character from the long-running Channel 4 soap opera Hollyoaks, played by Jessica Fox. The character first appeared on 6 July 2005.

I removed the British and television part etc. because I was basically following the EastEnders articles. I have told a few editors about the project via their talk pages so hopefully they will support it.  Who niverse 93  talk?  20:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah okay I suppose but to be honest, I think the EastEnders articles are better written, with a project I'm sure what way to write will be thought out. I shortened Tony down but I'll try to add description etc.  Who niverse 93  talk?  21:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Happy WikiBirthday (a day late)
I saw from here that it's been exactly three years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 05:41, 12 August 2009 (UTC) r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 05:41, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Corrie and EE infoboxes
For some reason all the text has gone smaller and the profile section seems to have been cut out, so their dob's aren't showing, do you know what has happened?? Alex250P (talk) 21:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Corrie
Hi! It's been ages since I've worked on Coronation Street articles, but I had access to one of the Daran Little books today, and there was quite a lot of useful stuff on Betty Turpin that I'm adding to the article at the moment. I remembered that a while ago you said you'd gotten hold of one of the anniversary books, and I wondered if there was anything about Betty in there? No worries if not, I'm just hoping that with a bit of a push, it could possibly be the first Corrie GA :) Frickative  19:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Hollyoaks
Yeah, the pages are improving but there is still a lot of work to be done anyway. The project has 5 supporters behind it so I think we're well on the way to getting it.  Who niverse 93  talk?  09:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Cindy Cunningham
I have just cleaned up Cindy Cunningham's storylines and then I realised on your User page that it said 'work in progress'. I hope I haven't disturbed anything you were working on/planned to work on because I know how irritating that can be. Sorry :)  Who niverse 93  talk?  23:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for that :) W93 (talk) 22:26, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Reply
I just take screenshots from HollyoaksBabes.net and cut out just the face, after the dispute we had about the site, I thought well I may as well just use the face instead of the whole image and use it. I didn't expect a barnstar to be honest, and I felt like you deserve one if I do. :) W93 (talk) 09:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Students
Sorry, I didn't mean rewrite Nancy. I was thinking of those which I thought needed it, I should have checked hers first. Great work with Charlotte's article, no one would believe she has only been in it a few months, unless they read it lol. W93 (talk) 20:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Iknowyouwantmecalleocho.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Iknowyouwantmecalleocho.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ xplicit  04:11, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Hollyoaks
Lol, don't worry about it. I always notice mistakes I've made after I save the page :) Does your internet browser underline spelling errors like in Word? I didn't want to correct the mistakes on Loretta's because I felt like you had just created it and I was already editing it haha! I'll perhaps make one for Cheryl in the next few days. I can't believe C4 deleted the Load & Go, it was really good for character's personalities, for example Charlotte's clothing style. Good job anyway! W93 (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh that's good then :) Yeah I think perhaps we should wait before creating India's or Dave's. I'm not sure whether India will be back though :S W93 (talk) 20:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm still struggling to find images for male characters though. Yeah there is some major work to be done with so many of the articles but I'm sure we'll manage it :) What do you mean by "within the project"? BTW lol W93 (talk) 00:16, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * How could I forget the project lol haha! :) I would take screen shots but my laptop does not print screen for some reason so that kinda sucks :( yeah I have msn, hmm...what would be the best way to tell you it without publicly broadcasting it on Wikipedia? :S W93 (talk) 00:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah I agree, but some people would argue that it's not a "social networking site". They could have private messaging too though. W93 (talk) 00:39, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah I've added you but your apparently not online :) W93 (talk) 00:54, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Dave Colburn.JPG
-  F ASTILYsock  (T ALK ) 21:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:CherylBrady.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:CherylBrady.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 15:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

RE: Character names
Well I think the full names are at the start of articles because it's more encyclopaedic to introduce the character's full name and nickname etc. As for Zak's old name, I'm not sure whether it should be mentioned as his previous name because I don't think they will ever reference it in the show, mainly because of Hayley and Caleb. It could be included in the opening paragraph, perhaps saying "Zak first appeared on-screen from 2004 until 2005, when the character was known as Zak Barnes..." W93 (talk) 23:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Josh Ashworth.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Josh Ashworth.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock  (T ALK ) 00:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

ya know what i was going to say sorry but im not going to now!! **** u! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianwazere (talk • contribs) 19:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

ok i shouldn't have been swearing im sorry for losing my cool now lets put this behind us:).Am nope im not really a fan of the aussie soaps and besides i just wudnt get time to watch them why do you ask??.i like da British and Irish soaps alot better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianwazere (talk • contribs) 22:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

oh ya i meant to change that haha i used to watch them during da summer when i didnt have to think about school ha i dont any more though,i now only watch emmerdale,Eastenders nd corrie:) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianwazere (talk • contribs) 17:21, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Loretta Jones
Hi, thanks for your message, hope you didn't mind me going through the section, I thought you did a pretty good job at getting it all in there, it's so easy to sensationalise, but I thought the way you did it was great. Will check out the other bits you mentioned when I have some more time to sit and read properly lol. Must go back to work lol. Hope you have a great weekend :). Sky83 (talk) 17:57, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Back
Just to let you know, if you wondered where I have been the last few weeks, I'm back. My internet stopped working so I couldn't even get on to let anyone know lol. Oh well, I'm back now, and I have wireless on my laptop so I'll be able to be on Wikipedia more often. W93 (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Vicky Rodewyk
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Vicky Rodewyk. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Vicky Rodewyk (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Raintheone! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Beth Chote -
 * 2) Joseph Crawford -
 * 3) Damon Andrews -

Loretta Jones
I noticed you nominated the Loretta Jones article for a GA. I think this is a good idea and if she gets it, it proves how valuable the character is to the project. It seems this child-killer plot has made her one of the most notable characters, and it never even aired! I was considering nominating Zoe Carpenter once she has left (after tonight's episode). However, I think I will have to find and add more sources/quotes etc. before doing so. :) Whoniverse93 (talk) 17:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh my! Haha :) I don't really know how to thank you enough for actually putting all that effort in to find them sources for Zoe's article. It definitely has the potential to be a GA. I was going to start collection of even more sources this weekend. Now it seems I won't need to do that much work. LOL. I will definitely find somewhere for all these sources :D thanks again. Whoniverse93 (talk) 21:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: Rebecca Robinson

 * Hi, I have had to revert your edit to the picture on Rebecca Robinson (Neighbours). Sorry but the picture just didn't look right on the article, made her face appear very long!  --5 albert square (talk) 23:39, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

j RAIN the ONE  02:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I replied to your message on 5asq's talk page since I believe 5asq is on holiday at the moment. Hope you don't mind! :) - JuneGloom07    Talk?  20:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Declan Napier
Hi, I've asked my friend, HJ to review the Declan article and he said he would add it to his to-do list. I'm not sure how long it'll be before he reviews the article, but it will be quicker then leaving it on the nominations page and waiting for someone to find it. I can't wait till the article I'm working on passes, then I can re-focus on the Neighbours articles. I really want to tackle Donna Freedman at some point. :) - JuneGloom07    Talk?  20:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Good job with the images. I love Donna's and I think Zeke's face is quite funny. I was just wondering whether you could capture an image of Sonya Mitchell and save it? Once I've got these Neighbours cast lists finalized, I think it'll be quite nice if they had a couple of images. I've almost completed 2010, just need to find a few more refs and I can finally upload it. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  00:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * June Whitfield joining Coronation Street? I'm looking forward to that. :) Btw, I don't know if you've seen this, but I thought it might come in handy for referencing the British soap's cast lists. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  13:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Do you want a laugh? Go and take a look at the Home and Away article, it's in a right state. Large amounts of unreferenced information, a production section with one sentence and a history section that gives a lot of detail about Neighbours' history. I'm just about to post a note on the talk page about it. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  16:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * We have a new Neighbours character infobox. I'm working my way through the Current cast of Neighbours, but there are a lot of character pages out there that need changing, so if you can help change some that would be great. :) - JuneGloom07    Talk?  12:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, I am the aforementioned HJ! I'm just dropping by to let you know I've started the review. there are a few issues that will need to be addressed and I've left a few suggestions for improvement. I have it watchlisted by my watchlist is huge so if you need me, you might be better dropping a note on my talk page. If you have questions, don;t hesitate to ask! Best, HJ Mitchell  |  Penny for your thoughts?   21:35, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I'll just put this here. Will Moore (Harry Ramsay) is leaving Neighbours. There's no reliable ref to update the article with yet, but I'll let you know as soon as I've got one. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  23:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Steve has now updated Perfectblend with the news (I read it in the forum), so I think it can be added to the article. We can replace the ref when the official website, Digital Spy, Holy Soap, etc reports it. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  00:18, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I know what you mean when you say the Paul Robinson storylines were like a book, lol. I started work trimming some of it a while ago. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  18:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi. I don't suppose you could upload an image of the new Summer Hoyland? The current image has been rmvd twice now, just because it shows the old actress in the role. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  18:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * You are a Star! :) - JuneGloom07    Talk?  20:23, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm loving the new images so far. :) Have you seen the edits made to the Current cast of Neighbours? Since Declan isn't going to leave the show for a period of time and then come back with a new actor, (he just goes upstairs and comes back as the new guy), his duration date should stay as 2007-. Right? Or have I got that wrong? - JuneGloom07    Talk?  13:34, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Ooh, adding some more images? Great! Will you add one to Billy Kennedy's article, now I've edited it? You also have a reply on my talk page. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  13:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Neighbours is 25! - check out the 'On this day...' section. :) - JuneGloom07    Talk?  00:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, I was just wondering if you would like to help me get Bridget Parker up to GA status? I've already made a start, adding in a Character development section and the teenage pregnancy info (shamelessly copied from Declan's article, but I have tweaked it). - JuneGloom07    Talk?  13:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I've just seen that you've uploaded a image of Miranda Parker. I need to speak with an admin friend of mine about the purple merge notice in the article before someone notices it and re-directs the article to the past characters list. I wasn't around for the discussion and I need to see if there is a way to stop the merge as I think the article can be saved. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  21:59, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I've spoken to my admin friend and he said if we can sort the article out and fix the issues, the tag can be removed. Finding the sources might be the big problem though. I'll need to get cracking on a 2007 character list just incase! - JuneGloom07    Talk?  00:21, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have had a good go at sorting the Miranda article out, but I need to stop and go write a 2000 word essay for tomorrow. Btw, Last Broadcast is amazing, look at all those interviews! - JuneGloom07    Talk?  12:23, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey. You have a couple of replies on my talk page, so have a look at them when you get a chance. Anyway, Rosemary Daniels is returning to Neighbours for a few episodes and the article needs a little work. I've managed to add some casting info, but would you have a look at these two interviews ( & ) and see what you can add to the article? You would do a better job then me as I always think that you manage to pick the best bits. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  16:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha, you were editing Paul Robinson's article at the same time I was editing his father's. Jim's article looks a lot better now, and has less risk of getting deleted. I wonder which Robinsons we should edit next, maybe Scott and Elle? - JuneGloom07    Talk?  16:35, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Are you trying to take over my edit count on the Paul Robinson article? :P He's one of my most edited articles apparently, 80 edits and counting. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  21:57, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't suppose you could upload an image of Declan with his new head? Someone tried to remove the current one. *rolls eyes* - JuneGloom07    Talk?  19:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Hey
-  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 01:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Nicki Minaj Jingle Jam.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Nicki Minaj Jingle Jam.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 01:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Che&#39;Nelle.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Che&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Nicki Minaj Jingle Jam.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Nicki Minaj Jingle Jam.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 18:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

GAN
Just a heads up that I've added a review for Loretta Jones. liquidluck ✽ talk 14:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Betty Williams (Coronation Street)
The article Betty Williams (Coronation Street) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Betty Williams (Coronation Street) for things which need to be addressed. Matthewedwards : Chat  07:26, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Peggy Mitchell
The article Peggy Mitchell you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Peggy Mitchell for things which need to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Emmerdale
Hi, I see that you're at WT:WikiProject Emmerdale... I don't suppose you're an editor with extensive Emmerdale knowledge? The need I have at the moment is a WP:RELIABLE birth date for Andy Devine (English actor), since there are IP editors (possibly all the same person) who keep adding "D.O.B 17 March 1949(age 61)" (or similar) to the Shadrach Dingle page, which I have been reverting as unsourced, and contradictory to the year 1942 given on the actor's article. -- Red rose64 (talk) 16:43, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Hollyoaks
I am sorry, I am just trying to help within the Hollyoaks project, and trying to make good changes, and really improve myself within Wikipedia. Thank you for offering me your help, I very much appreciate it.

Replaceable fair use File:SamClark.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SamClark.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 08:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Miss Robinson
Hey, I noticed you'd started work on Elle's article. There's some info on Elle's age change in that Low Culture feature, an interview with Pippa Black on Perfectblend and there's her profile on Neighbours.com (let me know if you use that one and I'll add the archive url to it). I'm working on Nina Tucker at the moment and then I want to start on Lou. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  15:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Have you seen this? I just found it while researching info for Sunny Lee. There's some great reception info there, the Lyn Scully entry really made me laugh. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  19:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, Lowculture's soaps section is a goldmine of reception info. Bridget's article now has a reception section thanks to Ruth Deller. I'm going to gather all the urls in my sandbox and list what characters they mention, so we can use them. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  14:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Done! Now, the fun part is adding them to the articles. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  15:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you add a nice picture of Sunny to her page, please? I've been working on the article for the past few days, just need to trim the storylines some more and add a characterisation section. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  11:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, were our only problems with getting Bridget's article up to GA a lack of reception section and possibly the storylines needing another trim? - JuneGloom07    Talk?  22:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Afternoon, I see you've decided to work on Rosetta's article. I was going to suggest to you that we focus on that group of Rosie, Frazer, Pepper, Will and Oliver next, but you've already started! I was going to take Pepper, because I'd found this news article (it also has some info for Rosie's article). I'm currently trying to sort the main Neighbours article out. I saw earlier that EastEnders is no longer a GA article (it was delisted) and I got a little worried about Neighbours. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  14:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, I found this interview for Annalise's article. Btw, Bouncer's picture is so cute. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  21:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Omg, two of the Neighbours books have arrived! We now have some info for the characterisation sections, but now I don't know which article to start with! Lol. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  10:40, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Look at what I just found for Sophie Ramsay, . - JuneGloom07    Talk?  16:03, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Hollyoaks: Again, Sorry.
Yea, again I am sorry, I forgot to sign my signature on the other message, so you might not of got it. I was wondering please if I could still have your help and guidance, as I really want to contribute to Hollyoaks articles where nessecary.

Thank you AcidBrights (talk) 21:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Hollyoaks
Thanks for that. AcidBrights (talk) 11:47, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Donna Freedman
Hi

I'm just wondering why she's been added to the category fictional bisexuals? I know that she shared a kiss with Sunny last year but it was literally a peck and nothing came of it! I wouldn't exactly class her as being bisexual because of that --5 albert square (talk) 00:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Cindy Hutchinson
Hi, just to let you know I changed the image on Cindy Hutchinson to a more recent one of her in 2010, as the other one was off last year and her appearance had changed, okay? :)

Ringo Brown
Hi

This is to let you know that the image for Ringo Brown has been nominated for deletion. I came across it quite accidentally, you can find details of the nomination. Please feel free to add any comments :) --5 albert square (talk) 04:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

A gift for you
You deserve it. :) - JuneGloom07    Talk?  12:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Aksent.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Aksent.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ xplicit  04:16, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Melanie Pearson Image

 * O Sorry, I uploaded an image of her practically the same time as you, as I've been talking to JuneGloom and I'm helping sort out the Neighbours articles, as you can see I have started Melanie. :) --AcidBrights (talk) 20:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gaz Benett.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Gaz Benett.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Summerh.jpg
Hi Good to see some attention paid to this image - i uploaded the original - not that screenshot from Ten that replaced it - i think the policy on fair use needs to be amended anyway - almost every tv channel slaps a watermark on its programming now so they are hard to avoid. Paul Austin (talk) 09:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Bianca Jackson
Hi there, I've reviewed Bianca Jackson against the GA criteria and placed the article on hold. I thought it was a pretty good article when I read through it, but found a number of small issues that will need to be addressed. Let me know if you have any questions. Regards, -- Beloved Freak  13:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Becky article
Hey. With regard to the Becky McDonald article, I noticed a few issues in the first section. Among other matters, it reads like a continuation of the lead, when it's supposed to be independent of the lead, as best I understand the policy.

". . .working in the factory."

What factory?

". . .with Steve Frost initially pitching the idea. . ."

Who's Steve Frost?

"Kelly commented:"

Who's Kelly?

". . .of bringing in her on-screen family."

The use of "on-screen" didn't seem necessary here.

"Although this never materialised and Becky returned without any relatives."

Might be best to replace "although" with "however," followed by a comma.

"Kelly was initially only cast for a three-month period, but impressed producers and was offered an extended contract as a regular character."

When did the character debut?

"On 17 June 2008 Kelly impressed bosses and [they] signed her for a further 12 months."

Assuming this is a second extension, how much time had passed since the first one?

"In February 2009, Kelly again had her contract extended, securing her role in the soap until 2011."

So that would be a two-year contract at minimum.

"In 2010 Kelly was signed to a further 18-Month contract. . ."

Does "further" mean that 18 months were added on to the 2011 expiration? If so, why does the lead section claim that she's only contracted until 2011?

If you mean that in 2010, the number of months she had remaining on her contract were extended from around 12 or something to 18, it may be best to clarify that.

Anyway, it could be that I'm overlooking something, but I was a tad confused at times, so I thought I'd bring these matters to your attention. -- James26 (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Good luck with the nomination. -- James26 (talk) 17:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Neighbours GAs
So, I've gone and nominated Susan. Not sure how well it's going to go, since there is a lack of casting info. All I wanted was one little article that said "Jackie Woodburne got the part of Susan after an audition". Now she's out of the way though, I'm thinking about turning my attentions to Steph's article. Do you want to help out with that, since you added the relationships info? I'm also working on the 2008 characters list and hoping that the Holy Soap website comes back soon with all the news stories still there. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  11:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

My Talk
Please dont add any reviews to Animal, it already contains 10 and reception should not contain more then 10 :) (CK)Lakeshade ✽ talk2me  17:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Bianca Jackson
Hey! :) I've been working on the GA review for Bianca Jackson, and after chipping away at it for an hour or so a day over a few days, there are only a dozen items left that need to be fixed. I've pretty much reached my limit with the article, but having left a message at the EastEnders WikiProject asking for someone to have a look at the rest of the issues, there's been no response =/. I don't know whether you're familiar with the storylines in question for the remaining points, but perhaps you could take a look and see? It would be a real shame for it to end up failing now, after putting so much work in! Frickative  17:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I see you've fixed a couple of things, so thanks. Have you any more plans to fix the other issues? If not, I'll have to fail it. It would be a shame, Frickative's put a great deal of work into it, but it may be that it's just not possible at this time. It needs someone who's familiar with the text and the source material to answer the remaining concerns. This is why, in general it's a good idea to be more familiar with articles that you nominate for GA, and be prepared to fix any issues raised. Anyway, let me know what you think. I don't want to clog up the nominations page for too much longer, and if it fails now, someone can always renominate whenever some more work's been done on it. -- Beloved Freak  09:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello, I've closed the GA review and unfortunately the article has not passed at this time. It's been on hold for nearly two weeks and it's three days since you said you'd work on it, but it doesn't look like much is happening. Hopefully without the time pressure, you or anyone else that's interested can deal with the last few issues and renominate. Regards, -- Beloved Freak  09:16, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Hollyoaks
Thank you so much for that, I've been learning a lot, and I have you too thank for that aswell and I'm so happy with the way Lydia is going and Gabby. I will sort Jem and Eva's articles which I was thinking about doing anyway. :) --AcidBrights (talk) 09:36, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Oh and I'm going to try and sort out Hayley Ramsey's article too, as Kelly Marie Stewart is returning. --AcidBrights (talk) 09:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Eva Strong
Hello, I've been heavily editing Eva Strong's article just like we discussed and its looking and reading much better, and then i'll try and tackle Jem Costello's article, but their arn't many references, so I'm not sure about it, what do you think about it?--AcidBrights (talk) 09:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Hollyoaks - JC
Just to let you know, I didn't create Jem Costello's article.. :)--AcidBrights (talk) 16:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Becky McDonald
Hello. I was just wondering if you are still reviewing the article? It's just that it's been well over a week now since you placed the review peice on the GAN's page. Thankyou.  RAIN the ONE  (Talk) 21:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I am really, really sorry about it, I forgot to remove my sign when I reviewed another article. I apologize for any inconvenience. Tb hotch Ta lk C.  03:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Martha Mackenzie and Ruth Deller
I don't watch Home and Away and I don't know who Martha Mackenzie is, but I'm currently fixing her article. Why? Lol. I just stumbled on it, noticed the the state it was in and thought "I wonder if I can make this better". If you know who Martha is, please help me out with the article. On another note, Ruth Deller has been amazing again and has written a "Soapstar Superstars: Jan-June 2010" article. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  16:16, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Right, well the Home and Away cast list page has turned into a nightmare. Until a consensus is reached on the talk page, I suggest we leave the article as it is. I noticed you went to the Soap Operas WikiProject to get some advice, that was a good idea (why didn't I think of that?) I had to ask another editor if my decision to change the tables was stupid, I think I regret doing it now. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  22:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)  ‎

Orphaned non-free image File:Eddiewindass.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Eddiewindass.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Rae Wilson
To be honest with you, I realised this afterwards.. so, I think i'll merge it back.--AcidBrights (talk) 07:16, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Rae Wilson.. again
I've merged it back properly.--AcidBrights (talk) 07:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Becky McDonald article
I'm wondering if the "Characterisation" section could be tightened a bit. This is just my opinion, but these were the two issues that stood out:


 * 1. To me, it feels like the section could make a stronger opening statement about how the character was introduced, or what her upbringing was. I almost think the "Backstory" section, or something like it, could be placed at the start of "Characterisation."


 * 2. It feels like the section wanders a little and gets a tad random here and there. Maybe it could mention sooner that she's an ex-con, then give greater focus on how that, and other things, affect her personality (her "trailer trash appearance," her "hard-up lifestyle," her dislike of being ordered, her lack of aspiration). Afterward, perhaps the parts about how she's changed -- and stayed the same -- could be given more detail.

There are a few other things that could be specified. At the start of "Relationships," it's mentioned that her partnership with Roy was particularly successful. Does that refer to a romantic partnership? Also, why was it successful?

In "Storylines," it's mentioned that she framed Kelly for theft. Again, I was left wondering why. Did they have a falling out, or did Becky just use the frame to her advantage?

Is the Daily Mirror a reliable source, being a tabloid (I imagine you'd know better than I would)? I also wonder if the opening picture could be changed or updated, but that's just personal preference.

These are just my opinions, but they were things that kind of took me out of the article while reading. I certainly see potential in the page, though. -- James26 (talk) 15:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm going to review Becky's article for you. I'll add my comments after I've had a read through. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  15:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * In response to your message, you're welcome. I was actually looking at it from a critical standpoint myself, but I wasn't quite ready to review due to the issues I had. Anyway, I'm glad it's going to be reviewed. -- James26 (talk) 16:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thankyou June for starting the review. I appreciate it. James, well the whole point of the review is to make points like the ones you made, you could have done the review and I've of changed it for you, but it was already peer reviewed so I didn't see the point. RAIN the ONE  (Talk) 16:41, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you do me a quick favour? I've just placed the info in List of current Home and Away characters into tables and I just need you to make sure everthing is correct. I'm not up to date on who's recurring, leaving or arriving. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  21:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

List of current Home and Away characters
The layout of the article has been changed completely twice in recent weeks. I think that the format I used is the best way to go forward. There is already a List of Home and Away characters which contains this detail in table format, if someone just wants to know who played who when they can go there. As I said on the talk page there, I think the tables of current characters and recurring characters should be reinstated on the series article. Most of the characters don't have articles as a result of being deemed not notable enough, this page is the only reasonable place to include information about them. I noticed you also reverted several other edits on the grounds of "vandalism" when many of them improved the article and made it more accurate.Skteosk (talk) 15:47, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

List of current Home and Away characters
Just a note that you broke the three-revert rule on that page. Protection and discussion seems more productive to me than blocking, but please be more careful about the rule in the future. Requesting protection is a good option before making that fourth-or even third- revert. Courcelles (talk) 23:25, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
GorillaWarfare talk  17:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Rae Wilson
Its up to you, do you think we should do it or not?--AcidBrights (talk) 19:42, 12 July 2010 (UTC) Btw, because of Kim Tiddy's interview on DigitalSpy do you think it would be credible to create her article, as she is going to be a main character anyway.. and there are a few refs.

Okay, I've thought about it, and it should be created (Rae Wilson), I don't know whether you want me to do it or not, but we can do it between us if you want.--AcidBrights (talk) 07:40, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for that, yeah Jem and Rae's articles look really good don't they! Which articles are you going to tackle next?--AcidBrights (talk) 07:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Btw, do you think that Hollyoaks should start using hte infobox soap character 2 like neighbours and eastenders as it looks really good on those articles? --AcidBrights (talk) 07:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah your right about those editors, I hate it when they add all the different family, apparently Gabby Sharpe has two half sisters called Bev and Debs and she has a mother called Sherie and apparently Eva Strong has a mother call Lily Verni. It is really annoying. Oh and thank you about Indigo Walker, I've really learn't a lot and I owe some of that to you, so thanks! :)--AcidBrights (talk) 21:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Anne Wilkinson
I've met the challenge. Tackled her Good! lol.

Conquistador2k6 13 July 2010 00:22 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:John Paul McQueen.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:John Paul McQueen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:33, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Hollyoaks
I want to tackle some more recent articles, like I wish we could make one for Duncan Button but their's hardly any references. And Martin Campbell is the same, he could have a good article like with his development and stuff, but ZERO refs. And Kelly Marie Stewart is returning as Hayley as she announced on her twitter and Paul Marquess mentioned it in an itnerview with Digital Spy, so that article needs sorting a bit. So, what do you think?--AcidBrights (talk) 21:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Charlie Buckton
I know I said I'd stay away from the Home and Away articles, but I think this one has potential as there is so much info out there for her storyline with Joey Collins. Plus, the actress has been nominated for a few awards, which would give us an instant reception section. Do you want to tackle it with me? - JuneGloom07    Talk?  20:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Doh! I've taken on another one. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  17:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I've just purchased the Neighbours 20th anniversary book. It had better be worth the money, lol. Hopefully it'll give us some new info to add to the articles. How are the Hollyoaks articles going? - JuneGloom07    Talk?  20:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you possibly get an image of Chris Pappas? I'm thinking about moving his info from the list to a seperate article. His coming out storyline airs this week and there's quite a bit of info already out there. Even Susan Bower has spoken out about it. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  16:37, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll look for one now. :) RAIN the ONE  (Talk) 16:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Oh, Paul Robinson is going to be pushed off the top of Lassiters in the 6000th ep. It's going to be a big storyline (sort of a "who pushed Paul?"), so I was thinking you could add some info about it to his character development section. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  16:56, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll get to it in a min, I think it's cheesey though how Susan B says: Who pushed P.R... who shot J.R... haha. Btw I have the image, just say when you need it. His own article is a good idea, it's good that it's got people chin wagging. RAIN the ONE  (Talk) 17:09, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll sort Chris out in a minute, I got distracted by the new detective. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  17:56, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Chris Pappas has been created. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  23:50, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If you want the Neighbours 20th anniversary book, someone is selling it on Amazon for £7.99 (which is twenty pounds less than I paid for it >_<). - JuneGloom07    Talk?  23:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey!
Hey, so what you up to today any articles your thinking about doing? And by the way, I know its not much but I could do an article for Duncan Button with some refs from digitalspy, like in the gossip from hollyoaks press day and stuff, and the episode of his arrival and some stuff on DigitalSpy, oh and about him shaving for the role and stuff, but I don't know really it could be good and Lucy Allan's interview on Producers perspective she mentions him too? So do you think it would be credible?--AcidBrights (talk) 09:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh and I was thinking we are probably the only two regular editors of hollyoaks articles so maybes we hsould just start using those infobox soap character 2's instead of hollyoaks ones.--AcidBrights (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Ohh Fruity says he completely supports the change over, so I suppose we could get started yeah?--AcidBrights (talk) 07:07, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I've done all of the present characters just need to do the lists of minor characters! :)--AcidBrights (talk) 16:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I think the infoboxes look great, theres still loads of past ones to do though, and thanks for the tip about the images. --AcidBrights (talk) 07:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Hollyoaks name
Is Mitzeee on hollyoaks just going to be credited as Mitzeee because if she is, we'll just have that name for the name of her article WHEN it is created, just like Eastenders have for Fatboy..--AcidBrights (talk) 07:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Danni Stark
Hello. In June you added a citation to a book from the "Webster's Quotations" series published by Icon Group International to this article. Unfortunately, Icon Group International is not a reliable source - their books are computer-generated, with most of the text copied from Wikipedia (most entries have [WP] by them to indicate this). I'm removing a lot of similar references; many other editors have also been deceived by these sources. Another publisher that reuses Wikipedia articles is Alphascript Publishing. Fences &amp;  Windows  22:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Brett Stark too. Wow, he was an annoying character! It wasn't citing anything surprising or important, I don't think. Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:03, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Bianca Jackson GA
I don't think we're ready yet! We should sort out the unresolved issues from last time before nominating it again. WT:EE. Anemone Projectors  22:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Ricky Campbell
Ricky has been list in the departed section on the Hollyoaks website, so he must have left on the quiet or do you think its a mistake? Btw, I've made Duncan's article. --AcidBrights (talk) 11:20, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

They must have dropped his storyline on the quiet. Btw, did you see Loretta's exit, it was so sad wasn't it, poor Loretta, Lucy wasted such a good character their.--AcidBrights (talk) 15:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh, well you can add them if you want, I mean its up to you, I just thought cos there was no refs thats all, you can just copy and paste it back over, as the rest was rubbish.--AcidBrights (talk) 16:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Melissa Walton


The article Melissa Walton has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Marcus  Qwertyus   23:24, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LorettaJones.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:LorettaJones.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you so much, I really appreciate that! :)--AcidBrights (talk) 07:07, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LorettaJones.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:LorettaJones.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

New article maybe?
Hey, I've just been looking at an EastEnders article which is the history of it, explaining each tenure of producer, who they axed, who they introduced etc and their storylines - so, I was thinking maybe we could either add a history section to the main Hollyoaks article or we could make a History of Hollyoaks article as I know most of the axings and theres refs from about 2004 really so we could add a lot really. So, what do you think about it? It could be a joint collaboration we could both have tasks for it and seperate the work between us?--AcidBrights (talk) 15:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Right, so we'd have a lot of references about axings and introductions from Allan and Kirkwood era, and loads from Marquess, so its all about consolidating them. Do you think we could have enough references we could also talk about people that choose to leave etc..? --AcidBrights (talk) 18:18, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah thats definetly a good idea! Its looking like a great article! :)--AcidBrights (talk) 17:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Joseph Crawford
An article that you have been involved in editing, Joseph Crawford, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. J04n(talk page) 00:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello!
We haven't spoke in a while have we? I've still been editing away and I see you have too, I think now where probably the two most active Hollyoaks editors! Just to let you know, I've been doing a lot of editing of Lee Hunter's article as it had nothing on it before, and I think it looks much better now, but I've still got bits to do. I was wondering have you thought of anything that wre could takle, you've probably seen i've been editing the History of Hollyoaks article with different bits I've found.--AcidBrights (talk) 13:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Btw, out of the new characters which ones do you think we can make articles for now, as some of the newcomers have had interviews with Hollyoaks website, and announcements and stuff, so what do you think?--AcidBrights (talk) 15:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello, sorry i didn't reply i've been in Cornwall for the past week. :) Those articles are good choices.--AcidBrights (talk) 21:28, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Jasmine Costello: Changes?
Hi Raintheone. How are you? I enjoy your work.

I was just on a page for another of my favourite shows, Degrassi and on this current series (or season), there is also a transgendered character, female to male. On the Characters section, the person in charge referred to the character by her female name "Gracie 'Adam' Torres" and used female pronouns, but then there was a user who took offense to what was written and changed the name to Adam and all the pronouns to male. There was some debate but she did her research and referenced the MOS and that transgendered character is being referred to as male Here is the discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Degrassi:_The_Next_Generation_characters

I know that Jasmine is a bit different, as you are seeing her switching between both genders during the show, whereas Adam on Degrassi is only seen as "Adam" from the very beginning. Also, unlike Adam, Jasmine's family does not know. So, I was wondering if we should change the pronouns as well as the character's name in this article like they did for Degrassi. Should we wait until her secret comes out and she fully becomes Jason (I hope I am saying this in the proper terms)? How should we treat this article in the long run. I'm anxious to hear feedback. Thanks!74.14.183.54 (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2010 (UTC)samusek2

Veryan
Hello, I noticed you had replaced a simple reference to the book Cornish church guide by a Google Books reference. This seems to conflict with advice given in the last section here WikiProject Fact and Reference Check/Guidelines. Even with the simple reference a reader has the option of deciding to search Google Books.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 12:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the explanation, given your experience I will leave it the way it is.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 09:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)