User talk:Rainydey/sandbox

Zach's Review
Zbernstein21 (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The aesthetic section doesn't seem to have any citations, and the sentence at the end seems a bit repetitive—are you still working on this section?
 * The history section is very well written and easy to understand, even for someone who knows nothing about the topic.
 * The "Aesthetic" section and the "Emergence as an aesthetic style" section do not overlap even though they have the same focus, which is great.
 * I don't think the parentheses after PlayStation, Steam, and the video game titles are necessary (though I could be wrong).
 * I think the physics engine section isn't as clearly written as the rest of the article, but I see it's from the original article—will you be editing it or adding to it at some point?
 * Are there other applications of low poly other than physics engines that you could add to that section to make it into an "Applications" section?
 * Overall very well-researched and clearly written.
 * Thanks for the feedback. The parts you pointed out were things I was trying to figure out how to meaningfully add to. The physics engine section will likely get a full revamp, and the end of the aesthetics sections will be updated. Thanks again! Rainydey (talk) 18:43, 26 October 2018 (UTC)