User talk:Raistuumum

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Powers 17:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your edit to Piero Scaruffi
Your recent edit to Piero Scaruffi (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

The Beatles edit war
WP:EDITWAR and WP:CONSENSUS might be some helpful reading.

Also, Edit summaries more specific than "READ THE NOTE" and "Stop reverting me!" would be more helpful. / edgarde 18:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -- Rodhull andemu  02:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

August 2009
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Canthusus (talk) 06:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Lanthanoid
The issue has been discussed already, and there is no consensus for the changes you are making. Your recent changes have been reverted. If you feel strongly about it, you can try and convince the community of why you are right. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 06:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Edits on "Periodic table" - elements 109-111
You asked for my reason to keep elements 109-111 in the periodic table as "Unknown chemical properties". It is claimed in each of these elements' articles that their chemical properties are not known, always in the lead section:

Meitnerium: "It is placed as the heaviest member of group 9 (or VIII) in the periodic table but a sufficiently stable isotope is not known at this time which would allow chemical experiments to confirm its position, unlike its lighter neighbours."

Darmstadtium: "It is placed as the heaviest member of group 10 but a sufficiently stable isotope is not known which would allow chemical experiments to confirm its place."

Roentgenium: "It is placed as the heaviest member of the group 11 (IB) elements, although a sufficiently stable isotope is not known at this time that would allow its position as a heavier homologue of gold to be confirmed."

(Compare with Copernicium: "Recent experiments suggest that copernicium behaves as a typical member of group 12, demonstrating properties consistent with a volatile metal")

These claims have stood undisputed for half a year (they were apparently added by User:Drjezza in Sept. 2009), and I remember seeing a reference for them (though I haven't found it on a quick search - will search again). Are you sure that these elements (109-111) have been determined to be metals, and do you have a reliable source for this? If not, we should keep them as "Unknown chemical properties" as the default case. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 22:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * If you don't answer, I will revert the tables to "my" version as your claims are unreferenced. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 13:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Please stop edit warring over this, as you did at Template:Compact periodic table. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 12:40, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Should the transactinide category be included as an additional color on the Wikipedia table?
Your thoughts would be appreciated here. Flying Jazz (talk) 14:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563366697 your edit] to The Flaming Lips may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * six hour-long song titled "[I Found a Star on the Ground|6 Hour Song (Found a Star on the Ground)"] . This, along with two other songs, were released in September packaged with a set of spinning

Proposed deletion of I Found a Star on the Ground


The article I Found a Star on the Ground has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable song. There are references to it existing but I can't find substantial coverage of it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:The Flaming Lips
Hi. Regarding your edits to this template, please see WP:EXISTING. Navigational templates are for existing links. They do not function as discographies or as a complete listing, so please do not insert entries for a musical act's albums to its template unless they already have articles. Thanks.  Ss  112   21:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)