User talk:Raj9910

== Welcome! ==

Hello, Raj9910. Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

 Sincerely, SUN EYE 1 07:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suneye1&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:WelcomeVisual/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

July 2021
Hello, I'm KyloRen3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sanya Malhotra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Koimoi is not a reliable source.  Kylo Ren III  (talk ☎️) 11:19, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Copyright infringement
I can see that you are a new editor, but you need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Sundeep Kishan and other articles. The infringing text has been removed because the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web. When creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sanya Malhotra did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ManaliJain (talk) 12:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

https://s.koimoi.com
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please read: WP:REFBEGIN, WP:RELIABLE and WP:ICTFSOURCES. ManaliJain (talk) 07:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Koimoi
Koimoi is not considered a reliable source per WP:ICTF. Please stop referencing content from it. Thanks! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Mrunal Thakur have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 03:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

You were earlier also warned about the same. Please stop using non-reliable sources especially Koimoi. Kindly read: WP:RELIABLE, WP:ICTFSOURCES. ManaliJain (talk) 03:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Siddhant Chaturvedi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. ''Koimoi is a non-reliable source. Kindly read: WP:RELIABLE, WP:ICTFSOURCES.'' ManaliJain (talk) 06:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Mrunal Thakur have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Read WP:LINKSTOAVOID. ManaliJain (talk) 13:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Samantha Ruth Prabhu. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello Raj9910. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Raj9910. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Koimoi isn't a reliable source. Please read: WP:RELIABLE, WP:ICTFSOURCES.'' ManaliJain (talk) 12:37, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Raj9910. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 16:25, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * As I have read the guidelines that multiple accounts are allowed but I am not advertising anything here. I just write the single sentence and add the citation for proofing. That's it. I am doing the editing under the guidelines. Kindly refer this and unblock my accounts Raj9910 (talk) 10:01, 22 July 2022 (UTC)