User talk:Raj r n singh

February 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Suhaldev, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 06:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Rajbhar, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 08:12, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

I removed content because that was on false info. there are misinformation like. 1)Rajbhar are Not bais 2)Sources were not prooved 3)Rajbhar and Bais are independent castes Raj r n singh (talk) 08:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

I mean Rajbhar are not bais they belongs to only bharshiva nagvanshis. Raj r n singh (talk) 08:31, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Important information

 * Please note that caste promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia. Also, please edit only logged in to your account. Is the IP 2402:3A80:1CA7:55E8:316C:86F:BD0B:F7ED related to you? Please reply below. Bishonen &#124; tålk 07:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC).

Article block
You have added uncyclopedic remarks ("No historian has been able to prove about Rajbhar caste whether it is Shudra caste or Kshatriya"), unproven caste promotion ("Some historians say that,they belongs to Naagvanshi Kshatriya") to Rajbhar again, and your rephrasing of some parts lowers the quality of the English prose. For instance, the well-phrased sentence "The rajbhar are traditionally laborers" was changed to "Today, most of the Rajbhars do small jobs to earn their living. They do labor work in today's time and some people are also in good position." I'm sorry, but your edits are not good for the article. I have page-blocked you from it. Note that you can still edit the rest of Wikipedia. That includes editing Talk:Rajbar to discuss changes to the article, and to try to gain consensus for changes you want to make. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing  on this page. Bishonen &#124; tålk 08:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC).


 * I haven't written anything wrong please unblock me. Whatever I have written is written with source. Raj r n singh (talk) 09:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I have written there that they do small jobs but they used to be the kings of the past. That's why I wrote that. I hope I will be unblocked. Raj r n singh (talk) 09:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I am not doing promotion but giving information with sources Raj r n singh (talk) 09:39, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Again, you can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing  on this page. You must replace "your reason here" with your actual reason. You may want to read the Guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:56, 24 September 2022 (UTC). PS, I have to tell you that it makes a pretty bad impression that you didn't answer my question in the section above. Bishonen &#124; tålk 09:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC).