User talk:RajaRajaCholan

May 2017
Your addition to Sangamithra has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''Diff: Content you submitted here can be found verbatim here. It is a basic concept in academia that you do not copy content from other sources. WP:PLAGIARISM, in addition to being a violation of copyright, is academically dishonest and lazy, is no different from theft, and is not tolerated at Wikipedia.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Vivegam. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diff: Unless you happen to be the living incarnation of Rotten Tomatoes, please don't add summaries of critical response unless they come directly from an established, reputable source. It's not our job to draw conclusions in articles, especially about subjective matters. This would constitute original research. Thank you.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 10:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, re: this, where you switch "mixed" to "negative", this is not constructive when the source in the article describes the critical response as mixed. The edit summary you pasted was one of my standard summaries, and it's clear that you don't understand what my summary meant. It means that phrasing such as "mixed to negative" or "mixed to positive" or "positive to mixed" or "negative to mixed" are meaningless and shunned by the community. The community doesn't seem to have a problem with "mixed", and I'm baffled how you'd think to change it to negative. Also, please stop marking your edits as minor. This feature is for cosmetic changes only, like typo fixes, adding wikilinks, etc. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 10:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Yeah okay..!! - RajaRajaCholan

Blocked as a sockpuppet

 * You would need to request an unblock from your first account. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Dude, LOL what are you talking about this is my only account in Wikipedia.RajaRajaCholan (talk) 8:39 PM, 20 September 2017 (UTC)