User talk:Raja Hussain Iqbal

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raja Of Rajouri (April 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raja Of Rajouri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raja Of Rajouri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Raja_Of_Rajouri Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheSandDoctor&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Raja_Of_Rajouri reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The SandDoctor Talk 18:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raja Of Rajouri (April 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raja Of Rajouri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raja Of Rajouri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Raja_Of_Rajouri Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Heliosxeros&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Raja_Of_Rajouri reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS message 15:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 16:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Rajouri, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:08, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Rajouri does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 16:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Rajouri. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 23:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 23:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Pandava, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 13:19, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rajouri, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:53, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

The material was copied directly from another website, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. Diannaa 14:37, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raja Of Rajouri (May 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1997kB was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raja Of Rajouri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raja Of Rajouri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Raja_Of_Rajouri Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:1997kB&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Raja_Of_Rajouri reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jarral. - Arjayay (talk) 15:33, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jarral, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 15:36, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism, as you did at Raabta (film). None of your changes appear constructive, especially when contrasted against a reliable source. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:13, 27 May 2018 (UTC)