User talk:Rajah524

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! . . dave souza, talk 06:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Blogspot linkage
Thanks for you contributions. I had to remove a few blogspot links from three articles that you edited today; Self-published sources are considered less than optimal on Wikipedia because the present problems with verifiability, which is one of Wikipedia's core policies. For what it's worth, none of those articles lack for external links, so it is not a big loss. However, since these appear to be reprints of published works, an exception could conceivably be made for these links if If these links pass the above criteria, my suggestion would be to ask on the Talk pages for these articles if these external links would be relevant and helpful. / edg ☺ ☭ 11:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) the original publications are considered a reliable source,
 * 2) the subject matter is considered helpful by the editors of those articles,
 * 3) "sigh.ko.blah.grr"'s reprints are with permission (not violating copyright),
 * 4) "sigh.ko.blah.grr" is the best or only online reprint of these materials,
 * 5) Rodger Garrett is confirmed to be a reliable editors, and the true editor of "sigh.ko.blah.grr". (I have not heard of this blog or Mr. Garrett, so please forgive me if these are well-known in their field.)

Welcome!
Hello, Rajah524, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Flagging Self-talk_Identification,_Questioning_%26_Revision_(SIQR) for further review
Hello, Rajah524 … I recently encountered the article about Self-talk_Identification,_Questioning_%26_Revision_(SIQR) and in my opinion, it either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for Academics, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I am considering tagging  for deletion according to the Deletion policy … I do not have time to examine the article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that Some Other Editors (including at least one administrator) may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Starting an article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now, and I am always available to help you become a more proactive contributor.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings … I apologize if some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. — 71.229.206.68 (talk) 22:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

I have placed this flag on your article about SIQR in relation to its academic nature and unsuitability for wikipedia at this moment. You may work to improve the article by including peer reviewed sources which explicitly describe this novel therapy instead of simply supporting its mechanism.

Welcome!
Hello, Rajah524, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Flagging Self-talk_Identification,_Questioning_%26_Revision_(SIQR) for further review
Hello, Rajah524 … I recently encountered the article about Self-talk_Identification,_Questioning_%26_Revision_(SIQR) and in my opinion, it either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for Academics, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I am considering tagging  for deletion according to the Deletion policy … I do not have time to examine the article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that Some Other Editors (including at least one administrator) may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Starting an article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now, and I am always available to help you become a more proactive contributor.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings … I apologize if some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. — 71.229.206.68 (talk) 22:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Self-talk Identification, Questioning & Revision (SIQR) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Self-talk Identification, Questioning & Revision (SIQR) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Self-talk Identification, Questioning & Revision (SIQR) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 00:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)