User talk:RajanSinghSidhu

Languages in films
You are both correct and wrong. Some Hindi films should not also be billed here as part-English films, just because they may have a few English dialogues, such as Taare Zameen Par and Ra.One. But there are many Indian films that have a large portion of English, like Delhi Belly, The Namesake, Being Cyrus, Dhobi Ghat, The Last Lear and so on, which deserve to come under the category "English-language Indian films". Kailash29792 (talk) 14:47, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I would agree with this. The English-language Indian film category has a fairly broad definition. Ravensfire ( talk ) 15:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Editing user talk pages
Please take a few moments to read through the User Talk page guidelines. Please note that on your talk page you may remove posts as you wish but on someone else's talk page you should not remove posts as you did here. Thank you. Ravensfire ( talk ) 15:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Apology
My apology. I often seem multiple languages listed. Template:Infobox film as good info on the "language" field description. Please try to add an edit summary as it is difficult to understand why you removed that info. I undid my edit to Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi There may be more reverts that I did. Cheers Jim1138 (talk)

Talk with them
I would suggest finding the appropriate policy regarding film languages, then have a discussion with those people. You can use wp:dispute resolution, but first understand the policy. Is it really a bilingual film, or is it a Hindi film with a bit of English? Take a look in WikiProject Film. Talking can work wonders! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:07, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Have you looked here? http://www.bbfc.co.uk/ Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The problem with IMDB is that anyone can get an account and edit the information. Thus, it is self published. See WP:SELFPUBLISH. I have run out of resources here. Sorry. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Ra.One
Please use the Ra.One talk page to discuss the infobox language parameter. There is already an existing discussion here with several points that may be relevant. Thank you. Ravensfire ( talk ) 18:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 April 5, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Do NOT remove comments from editors in a TFD like this and this again. You do NOT remove or change comments from other editors on a page like this. Period. '' Ravensfire ( talk ) 22:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * If you want to add a comment to the discussion, please make sure it focuses on policy-based reasons for keeping the template. Ravensfire ( talk ) 22:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I doubt you did, but take some time to read the comment I left on the TFD page. And then take a few moments to read the discussion I linked to why awards don't belong in the Infobox.  Seriously - you need to understand that you have to work WITH other people and if other people decide to use one approach (a consensus), you should work within that approach, not ignoring it and doing your own thing.  Time and again on this account and your TJK account I've tried to point you that way.  Good grief - I've even pointed you towards where you can try to get that consensus changed. Ravensfire ( talk ) 22:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Template:Infobox Indian TV actor. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Ravensfire ( talk ) 22:13, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Once again, don't do this or this again. It's painfully obvious you're doing this logged out.  Stop.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 15:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ra.One Japan.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ra.One Japan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;&#125;&#125; to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list