User talk:Rajannamysore

Speedy deletion nomination of Shilipi Sharma (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Shilipi Sharma (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 15:30, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shilpi Sharma (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Shilpi Sharma (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 15:31, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Somebody deleted the article. Please help.

July 2014
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Shilpi Sharma (disambiguation). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 15:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Other people with the same name


A tag has been placed on Template:Other people with the same name requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 15:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aakramana (2014) flim.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Aakramana (2014) flim.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of B Ajaneesh Loknath


A tag has been placed on B Ajaneesh Loknath, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GAB (talk) 22:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hemanth Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upendra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OM-Kannada Movie.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:OM-Kannada Movie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

File:OM-Kannada Movie.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OM-Kannada Movie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Mysore Mallige Scandal
Hello Rajannamysore. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mysore Mallige Scandal, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''WP:CSD is only for pages that "disparage, threaten, intimidate, or harass their subject or some other entity, and serve no other purpose". This is not such a page. If you think it should be deleted, consider AfD.''' Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 08:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Revert changes made 'filmography' of Yash
Hi Rajannamysore! My reverting was in no means to devalue your work. But, this a Wikipedia page and the filmography of an actor should only show his contribution in the film, such as his character name, roles other than acting and awards won, if any, for his performance in the corresponding film. For instance, see this — Suriya, Aamir Khan, Al Pacino. It does not go with an actor's popularity. Why not add info on the body of the article and cite sources, instead of resorting to adding superfluous info on the tabulated filmography? Thank you! Editor5454 (talk) 06:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

TfD
Hi. Please see this discussion. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 10:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2017
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Rajkumar (actor). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Diffs:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Porki Huccha Venkat


The article Porki Huccha Venkat has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable film, does not meet WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 11:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Shiva Rajkumar
Template:Shiva Rajkumar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- wooden superman  13:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Dee 03  05:46, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Please STOP removing well referenced and neutral statements, just because it hurts your "VOKKALIGA" sentiments. Rajannamysore (talk) 15:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)


 * You can find my reply on my talk page. Also, avoid posting the same thing in two places. Dee  03  16:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * You can find my reply on your talk page. Also, avoid posting the same thing in two places. Rajannamysore (talk) 18:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * What same thing did I post in two places? Dee  03  04:58, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Attack on Freedom of Press
During Kumaraswamy second tenure as Chief Minister of Karnataka. Post debacle of Lok sabha polls in 2019 results of Mandya constituency, where his son Nikhil Kumaraswamy lost to independent candidate Sumalatha Ambarish. Nikhil was reported to have been involved in drunken tantrum in Kannada daily Vishwavani News by popular investigative journalist Vishweshwar Bhat. Kumaraswamy ordered police action on Vishweshwar Bhat for reporting the story. This was widely criticized as 'Attack on Freedom on Press'.

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dee 03  05:52, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Vokkaliga. - Arjayay (talk) 19:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Vokkaliga, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 19:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * How can this be my ONLY warning, when you have said the same twice? Just curious.Rajannamysore (talk) 19:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Your recent editing history at Vokkaliga shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rockstone  talk to me!   21:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks:But the phrase "The word Gowda literally means head of territory, They are identified as landlords and village headmen. They are known to be a dominant and powerful caste in South Karnataka" is derogatory, inflammatory to rest of the community in the region. What is claimed is false, not referenced, unsubstantiated. Vokkaligas are less than 9% of the population in the state of Karnataka. There are listed in Backward Class in census. "Dominant and powerful caste" is reckless statement.
 * Edit warring is wrong, even if you're right. -- Rockstone   talk to me!   21:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Rockstone  talk to me!   21:50, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Am I supposed to do something about? may be worried? cry? or something else? Please enlighten me in this world of maaya. Rajannamysore (talk) 21:53, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Well you risk being temporarily blocked.... your best bet would be to make a comment here explaining your side of the story. -- Rockstone   talk to me!   21:55, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Vokkaliga. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:12, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I am not going waste my valuable anymore in Wikipedia. This is a mess! People making themselves feel powerful by empowering with this virtual democracy. Remember, there is a real world outside where you touch and feel the air, perhaps drink a coffee. MINDLESS PEOPLE. Rajannamysore (talk) 22:18, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Ab207. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Prashanth Neel have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Swathanthra Palya


The article Swathanthra Palya has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Film appears to fail WP:NFF  as nothing was found in a BEFORE to meets the notability guidelines"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PravinGanechari (talk) 07:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)