User talk:Rajatheexplorer

Possible username issue
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Gopatholabs", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Jack Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. -- samtar talk or stalk 12:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Inappropriate user name
According to our Username policy, user names should not be promotional (Username policy), which means the username should be assigned to a single person, and not name or indicate a company or society.

Your declaration &apos;We are a couple of people&apos; directly contradicts the policy which may cause the block of the account. I strongly recommend you to avoid using a collective account. Additionally you can ask for opinion at Requests for comment/User names, and/or start a change name procedure (see Username policy). Remember, however, to assign one person to an account.

Additionally, if the person wants to represent a company etc., they should make an explicit disclosure of their COI (Conflict of Interest) — please see Conflict of interest for general guidance and the Declaring an interest section there for declaring CoI. --CiaPan (talk) 12:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks a lot everyone for guiding me and giving a valuable information..

Spam by you
Please quit spamming articles with your garbage! --Hyperforin (talk) 12:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC) There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I've renamed your account. To get unblocked follow the 2 steps below: PhilKnight (talk) 23:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

See.You can see from my account it is only 2 days old.I have told so many times i did it by mistake.And also i am from INDIA.I am going to write about indian archeology(Very OLD),medical related stuff and mathematics..

July 2016
Stop using your company's blog as a reference. This was already pointed out to you before. References do not have to be online to be valid, and your company's blog may not be a WP:RS, so replacing a medical journal cite with your company's webpage is not a good idea. Meters (talk) 07:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Ya ,you are telling it perfect.but the thing is i found it invalid link .If you go through the link you will find the link is not there and also the journal doesn't have valid information.According to Wikipedia policy only (For best content),i gave this article as a link.You can verify with whoever you want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajatheexplorer (talk • contribs) 07:11, July 25, 2016‎
 * I don't understand your comment. The original link still points to the journal abstract page. You are replacing it with a link to your company's webpage, which another editor has already told you is not acceptable. If you think the information in the article is incorrect then discuss it on the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)