User talk:Rajeevbhatjiwale

Welcome!

Hello, Rajeevbhatjiwale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Valuation of suits in indian law, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Valuation of suits in indian law


A tag has been placed on Valuation of suits in indian law requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Appeal or revision against acquittal in complaint cases


A tag has been placed on Appeal or revision against acquittal in complaint cases requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I have declined the speedy-deletion nomination on these two articles, because I do not think the reason cited is applicable; but I have proposed them for deletion (formal notices below) because I do not think they are suitable material for an encyclopedia. Specifically, one of Wikipedia's content policies is that it publishes WP:No original research, and original research is defined to include synthesis, or "combining material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." This material is suitable, perhaps, for a legal textbook, but not for Wikipedia. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Valuation of suits in indian law


The article Valuation of suits in indian law has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This appears to be synthesis or original research - a legal pronouncement by an Indian judge, with a level of technical legal detail suitable for a textbook but not for an encyclopedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Appeal or revision against acquittal in complaint cases


The article Appeal or revision against acquittal in complaint cases has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This appears to be synthesis or original research - a legal pronouncement by an Indian judge, with a level of technical legal detail suitable for a textbook but not for an encyclopedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 14:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)