User talk:Rajesh1977

Welcome!
Hello, Rajesh1977, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Nanban (2012 film) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Introduction to referencing
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:33, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The gross figure of 150 crores for the film is reliably sourced (Indian Express is considered reliable per WP:RS and WP:ICTF), and it has been longstanding (WP:STABLE). You have to discuss and gain WP:CONSENSUS at Talk:Nanban (2012 film) first. Please do so, and do not edit it till we reach consensus, other wise you'd be edit warring. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * INDIAN EXPRESS MENTIONED KABALI COLLECTION AS 675/1000 CRORES CAN WE ACCEPT. WHY YOU ACCEPT THAT ALSO. THE USER OF NANBAN IS NOT CREDITABLE WRITER FOREIGN RETURN WITH BASELESS INFORMATION PLEASE NOTE SHE HAS INCLUDED NANBAN PRESALES WITH BOX OFFICE WHIC COMES TO 150 PLEASE CHECK TAMIL.CINEMAPROFILE.COM, BEST IF THEVYEAR.IN, INDIAN MOVIE STATS, FILMI BEAT WHERE PRODUCER INFORMS REPORTED COLLECTION ARE FAKE FIR 4 DAYS WE CANNOT BELIEVE EVERYTHING INDIAN EXPRESS SAYS THIS KIND IF INFORMATION EVERYONE WILL LAUGH AND WILL NOT TRUST WIKIPEDIA ASK ANYONE . ASK THE PRODUCER ITSELF HE WILL LAUGH.I WILL NOT EDIT I. AM BRINGING TO YOUR INFORMATION THR INFORMATION WE PROVIDE SHOULD BE CORRECT CHECK ALL THE NEWS Rajesh1977 (talk) 17:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If you want you can check the link i will provide since o am unable to attach Rajesh1977 (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Please discuss your concerns here, not in this talk page. so that other experienced editors can take PARt in the discussion. Tamil cinema profile and the other links you posted are not reliable. Also try going through the links I posted in your welcome message, that would be helpful in your editing. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Hi Rajesh1977! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Nanban (2012 film) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. ''Discuss your concerns in the talk page per WP:BRD. The sources you added are not reliable per WP:RS. You are edit warring now, you might get blocked.''. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:00, 2 July 2023 (UTC)