User talk:RajeshRawal Mewari

August 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Mirja Man Singh I has been reverted. Your edit here to Mirja Man Singh I was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.mapsofindia.com/who-is-who/history/raja-man-singh.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC) XLinkBot I am new to this platform and literally don't know about this. And I apologise.RajeshRawal Mewari (talk) 19:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask. S Philbrick (Talk)  12:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Good article nominations
Hi, thanks for your interest in Wikipedia. I noticed you had nominated a few articles at WP:GAN. To be passed at GAN, article need to meet the Good Article criteria. For most articles, this means rewriting them almost entirely. The articles you have nominated are quite far from meeting the criteria; they have many pieces that are not supported by good sources, and do not include all the relevant details. If you are interested in getting these to good article status, I recommend that you withdraw your nominations for the moment (instructions are here), choose one of the articles to work on, find good sources by looking through books, journal articles, and high-quality media articles, and rewrite the articles based on them. I'm saying this not to discourage you, but to help you avoid the frustration of multiple quick-failed nominations. Best, Vanamonde (Talk) 16:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

The article on Bhairon Singh Shekhawat has 2 criteria: 1. It is neutral. 2. It has no edit war Please take regards, Vanamonde93

RajeshRawal Mewari, I have removed all three of your GA nominations, since none of them were proper nominations: Maharana Pratap, B. R. Ambedkar, and Bhairon Singh Shekhawat. According to the GA instructions, Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. For the first two, you only made a single minor edit, and in the third, the only two edits you made have been deleted due to copyright violations; you are far from a significant contributor to any of them.

If you're interested in pursuing a GA nomination, I'd like to echo Vanamonde's advice about choosing one of the articles, finding good sources, and working on improving it. But also read the GA nomination instructions so you understand how to do the nomination properly when you get an article to the point that it meets the GA criteria. Best of luck going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

If you would like to pursue this particular nomination, you can begin a consultation, which should last at least seven days. If the response is that the article is not ready, then you shouldn't nominate it. I'd also like to recommend that you follow Vanamonde's advice. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)