User talk:Rajesh S Thiruppathi

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalathur (September 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kalathur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kalathur Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David.moreno72&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kalathur reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David. moreno 72   12:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Immanuvel Devendrar, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:58, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalathur has been accepted
 Kalathur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  06:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Kalathur help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maariaman temple kalathur (September 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maariaman temple kalathur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Maariaman_temple_kalathur Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Maariaman_temple_kalathur reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Maariaman temple kalathur


Hello, RajeshwaranJT. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Maariaman temple kalathur".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Vin09 &thinsp; (talk)   05:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Response
To address your deleted query:
 * Hi, Cyphoidbomb, stop deleting content without giving proper reasons. there is a limit and respect fro you. if you dont know things properly, just keep quiet and shut your mouth. stop reviewing and let others review, are you managing kabali page? why are you deleting appropriate contents without reasons?

If content is not written in proper encyclopedic tone, or contains grammar and spelling errors, or is not added in such a way to promote coherence, or if the user has added opinions as facts, or if the language is otherwise vague or unclear, then it would be the duty of any editor to remove the problematic content. In the case with these edits, you've accomplished all of the above. Now if you want me to explain in detail what the problems are, I'm happy to do so, but my choice to remove it is not arbitrary: So those are my reasons. Hope they help. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * You crammed the content into the lead sentence.
 * You've called Kabali a "a dalit philosophical movie". What does that mean? How will someone in Brazil understand that phrase? This reference you used doesn't expand upon the idea either.
 * You've asserted that the film was made "in a response to 2012 dharmapuri SC riots", well, that's not a fact, that's an opinion expressed by this guy. Why are we presenting opinions and hypotheses as facts?
 * You've said that the film was made "to promote the Scheduled caste philiosophy in tamil nadu". Well, 1) It's unclear what you mean by that. What is the scheduled caste philosophy? What does that mean? It's vague. And even if I were to understand what that means, it seems to be contradicted by the reference you included, which reads: "But the filmmaker doesn't want the caste identity. 'I believe in annihilating caste.'" How does that statement equate to "promotion" of caste?