User talk:Rajesh nandan

July 2017
Hello, I'm Snood1205. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rakul Preet Singh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 14:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rakul Preet Singh. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rakul Preet Singh was changed by Rajesh nandan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912651 on 2017-07-20T14:26:22+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rakul Preet Singh, you may be blocked from editing. Hayman30 (talk) 14:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shubra Aiyappa. Hayman30 (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Rajesh nandan, your edits are highly problematic, and I am sure that Hayman30 will be happy to explain what you can do to improve on them, if Hayman can stop simply slapping templates around. Drmies (talk) 14:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright. Rajesh nandan, it'd helpful if you could refrain from removing random lines or characters from the article, as you did with [1], [2] and [3], as it "breaks" the infobox formatting. You should also refrain from filling in random characters into infobox parameters, as you did with [4], as it is considered as vandalism on the project. Hayman30 (talk) 15:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hayman30, thank you for trying. Drmies (talk) 20:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 15:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)