User talk:Rajeshjnu2006

February 2020
Hello, Rajeshjnu2006. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add requestedit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 12:34, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

--- My response: Thank you so much for pointing out these sources, I was not aware of these rules and regulations. I am so happy to see that Wikipedia does not allow self-promotions and takes these things very seriously.

It may have been perceived that way but the purpose of those citations was not to self promote but just add more authenticity and currentness to the material. Yes, I know several good review articles written by top researchers in my field, that I follow and cite. I will make edits and cite those articles.

Again, thanks so much.