User talk:Rajini67

Regarding Edits to Draft: Niranjan BS
Please do not add photos for which copyright cannot be provided. Wikipedia already removed photos many times that others editors added for same reason. Basically, if we didn't click a photo, that doesn't belong to us and cannot be added here. And details such as DOB and family names, though true, are not found in any of the listed reliable secondary references, so those cannot be added right now, but in future, if any reliable references list them, then we can add them. This draft has already been declined for lack of such references. Adding such things might further damage its chances to becoming an article in future, so requesting you to kindly refrain from such edits. Thanks for your understanding. Ss ram (talk) 06:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello, I'm ObserveOwl. I noticed that you recently removed content from Debjani Modak without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 11:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Debjani Modak, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 17:03, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Do not resubmit declined drafts
Hi, please refrain from making unnecessary edits (I've explained the reasons already, it's in View History of the draft too) to Draft: Niranjan BS, especially pls don't resubmit it because it has already been declined. It is dangerous to resubmit it without adding more references (I've already added all available references and waiting for more such to become available in future) because there is a chance that it will be permanently rejected. So pls refrain from ruining the hard work of others. Ss ram (talk) 11:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I've placed a comment on the draft about it. However, try not to use ALL CAPS as you did here. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 13:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @ObserveOwl, I am so sorry. I did not know it must not be used and will ensure I don't use in future.  Got frustrated from the unnecessary edits and resubmissions without any true additions at all, so thought using ALL CAPS would draw their attention, but I'm sorry again. I thank you for educating me on this. Ss ram (talk) 13:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Debjani Modak, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Debjani Modak was changed by Rajini67 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952561 on 2024-07-04T01:38:19+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Debjani Modak have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Debjani Modak was changed by Rajini67 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952926 on 2024-07-13T06:28:15+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Debjani Modak. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Debjani Modak was changed by Rajini67 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953063 on 2024-07-15T02:59:56+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Debjani Modak, you may be blocked from editing. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 01:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Debjani_Modak. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 12:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)