User talk:Rajkumarth

Palaiyakkarar
Hi, this is regarding the addition of Sivagiri, Alagapuri and Elayirampannai palayams under the list of Maravar Palayams.

Sivagiri, Alagapuri and Elayirampannai were the three "vanniya" palayams of the south. The polegars were vanniyars and not from "Bania or Vannia subcaste of maravas". Please remove these palayams from the list of Maravar Palayams as this confuses the readers. I understand that you have quoted it from the website Princely states of India which inturn quotes K.Sridhar's book "History of Maravars". Please understand that this book is of recent origin (1970) and does not quote any government census or anyother reliable source.

Whereas that Sivagiri, Alagapuri and Elayirampannai polegars were Vanniyas by caste is mentioned in so many governement gazetters and district manuals of the british India and they base this information on the government census data.

References:

Castes and Tribes of South India - Edgar Thurston and K. Rangachari Madras District Gazetteers Tinnevelly Vol 1 - Pate H. R Political History of the Madura country - James Henry Nelson

I am hereby attaching the link for downloading Madras District Gazetteers Tinnevelly Vol 1 - Pate H. R for your reference. Please refer Page Number 429

pg 429 (book page number: 410)

http://www.ulib.org/cgi-bin/ulibcgi/ulibreader_path/bookReader.cgi?barcode=99999991346247&format=ptiff&curPage=1&handler=IISC

Book Information Title Madras District Gazetteers Tinnevelly Vol 1 Author Pate H R Subject General Language English Year 1917 Publisher Superintendent Government Printing Press Madras Country INDIA Pages 549 Identifier 99999991346247

Thanks Kalingarayar (talk) 08:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

2011 election
I am glad you are interested. please make sure that you add reference to everything you add and also please use   format while adding references. Thanks. --CarTick (talk) 23:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


 * please welcome to wikipedia. we are very pleased when new editors show up and always hope they remain engaged and reasonable. As far as the election article is concerned, i want to try for WP:Good article status when the election is over. let us try to keep it up to the mark. please feel free to continue editing the article. --CarTick (talk) 03:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Protection of Mukkulathor
Given there hasn't been a single reversion since the 29th December and there have been lots of constructive IP edits, I'm not really sure how protection of this article could possibly be appropriate. -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 22:02, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Cultural differences aren't enough to make this an appropriate request as cultural differences are always outweighed by similarities. You can add lots of sources to this article while IP editors are also contributing :). -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 07:49, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

page views
look at the number of page views for the 2011 election article. encouraging. --CarTick (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

constituencies
i see you are trying to create constituencies list. please use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_Nadu_legislative_assembly_election,_2006#Constituency_wise_results this as a model. we need to decide how much information we want to include before the election results are announced. --CarTick (talk) 15:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * i would say, we could copy and paste the table from 2006 election. remove the constituencies which were discontinued, add the constituencies which were newly added. remove names and parties. then we could add the candidates and parties contesting in these constituencies as this information becomes available. but, this is a choice we need to make. in two months from now when the results are announced, we will only have the winner and runner-up in the table. --CarTick (talk) 15:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

article in news
that is fantastic. congrats to everyone involved. --CarTick (talk) 17:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

please see my note
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tamil_Nadu_legislative_assembly_election,_2011#table --CarTick (talk) 04:42, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

2011 census of India
could you please help me? there is a lot of interest in the article, but it is in a very bad state. all information can be found here http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/prov_results_paper1.html. --CarTick (talk) 02:47, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

2011 Tamil Nadu legislative assembly election results
Please have a look and help me with your feedbacks. I have ordered the candidates in the form of The list will get expanded as I am working still on it.
 * Ruling alliance (DMK+).
 * Opposing alliance (AIADMK+).
 * Other recognised/ unrecognised parties alphabetically from state and national levels.
 * Independent candidates alphabetically.

I want to add the electoral symbols in the election box for each candidates, please help me with it.

—  kathamarai (talk) 17:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

images
Raj Kumar, it would be nice to have some images for the election article. cutouts, campaigns, rallies and any other relevant images will do. just suggesting in case you are living in India now. --CarTick (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kallupatti.JPG


A tag has been placed on File:Kallupatti.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 00:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Karaikeni.JPG


A tag has been placed on File:Karaikeni.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 00:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)