User talk:Rajnishsharma360

Welcome!
Hello, Rajnishsharma360, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as List of Indian Top MBA Colleges, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 09:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Indian Top MBA Colleges


A tag has been placed on List of Indian Top MBA Colleges, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 09:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, I'm Grayfell. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 07:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)



Invitation to join discussion at WP:INEI
As someone who has an interest in Education in India you are invited to join discussion about the use of Careers360 rankings. Your input is appreciated. --Muhandes (talk) 07:08, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I see you are adding these ranking, why not voice your opinion on the discussion? Should they be used? how? --Muhandes (talk) 14:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Adding Rankings
I noticed you added some rankings to infoboxes like here. Its good that someone adds this information, but note that you are adding it to the infobox, and infoboxes only summarize the text. You must also add it to the text. Here is a very simply example, that's all it takes. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 08:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Sourcing
In this edit you updated the data but didn't provide a source. I therefore had to comment out all the numbers. I would be happy to reinstate it if you provide your source. --Muhandes (talk) 13:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Muhandes
 * I have updated this cut off on the basis of Careers360's CLAT cut off article to check please visit at https://law.careers360.com/articles/clat-cutoff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajnishsharma360 (talk • contribs) 05:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, please don't edit without providing a source in the future. --Muhandes (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2017 (UTC)


 * OK, I will keep this in my mind in future. Thank you very much... comment added by Rajnishsharma360 (talk)•

Careers360
Are you in any way related to Careers360? I notice many of your edits use it as a source.--Muhandes (talk) 21:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Yes i'm working with Careers360 as a data analyst and researcher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajnishsharma360 (talk • contribs) 04:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. You might be in a conflict of interests. I advise caution when using material from Careers360. I'll post a boilerplate below with some information. --Muhandes (talk) 06:27, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Rajnishsharma360. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 06:27, 25 September 2017 You may ofcourse let me know why exactly a conflict of interest in this regard could prove detrimental to Wikipedia's (UTC)

`Thank you for the information Muhandes.

While I understand why you may perceive this as a conflict of interest, I would also like to assure you that all the data, links and information posted by me regarding the topics in question have been ratified and researched before being uploaded. Careers360 is just one of the many education websites in India, but it is also one of the largest and most well-respected. We have immense trust in the content we upload, and try and make it available to students via various portals, including Wikipedia. When the quality of your own content is accurate and relevant to the topic at hand, I do not see why or how I should post any other alternate link. You may ofcourse let me know why exactly a conflict of interest in this regard could prove detrimental to Wikipedia's reputation? I am more than happy to clarify and make transparent my association with Careers360 wherever required. Please suggest what would be an appropriate way forward from here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajnishsharma360 (talk • contribs) 06:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Please don't take this as an accusation, I am simply advising caution. I think the possibility of OCI is obvious. Careers360 is a commercial website. For sure it gains income by increasing traffic. Many of your edits send Wikipedia users to Careers360 for information, thus increasing traffic and creating income. You are at a conflict between using other sources and using Careers360 exclusively. Here for example you added information about the format of BHU-UET, which made me wonder. Why use your source and not this one? As a matter of fact, both sources are suspect, I'd use the original data source. I have no suggestion on how to move forward, but disclosing the conflict is a good start. --Muhandes (talk) 10:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)