User talk:Rajput m16

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Rajput m16! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 13:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

1

Image copyright problem with Image:Hindu Temple Old Mirpur-001.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hindu Temple Old Mirpur-001.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:48, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mirpur road-001.jpg
Hi Rajput m16!

We thank you for uploading Image:Mirpur road-001.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot.

--John Bot III (talk) 13:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mohammed Saleem
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mohammed Saleem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 15:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * You should know that adding hoaxes to this site is considered to be severe vandalism. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mohammed Saleem
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mohammed Saleem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? EyeSerene talk 16:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Explanation for all the notices on here
Hello Rajput m16. Apologies for the sudden mess of tags on this page - they appear automatically when articles are tagged using certain tools. I don't believe the page you created, Mohammed Saleem, is a hoax article, so I've removed the warning on the page and the notice of Speedy Deletion. However, unless you add more content to the article, especially to establish why Mr Saleem is notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia (with reliable sources to back it up), the article may still be deleted. If you have any questions, please leave a note on my talk page. All the best, EyeSerene talk 16:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I can't replace pictures, but I can put the text back. I thought your too-short article about Mohammed Saleem was a hoax, which shed doubt as to the validity of your other edits.  The subject is valid, but you really need to add a lot more info about this guy.  I'll revert back to your earlier edit on that Pakistan article.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Sure. Simply go to the page and look on the tabs on top. The one on the right is marked "watch." Click it and it automatically adds the page to a list of your watched pages. As far as the Mohammed Saleem entry is concerned, it's likely to be deleted in the next couple of days if it isn't expanded. Another user found a link to his bio which you can find on the article's talk page. Hope this helps. Best, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Flagging Mohammed Saleem for further review
Hello, … I recently encountered the article about Mohammed Saleem and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I am considering tagging  for deletion according to the Deletion policy … I do not have time to examine the article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that other editors may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now

Happy Editing! &mdash;  17:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Images
Simply stated, you can not claim "own image released into public domain" for images that are not yours - for example, the ones that were taken from Locate India Flickr the BBC and APLLG to name a few. Uploading copyrighted images and mistagging them is a very fast way to get permanently blocked from editing. SkierRMH ( talk ) 05:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Said images are all copyrighted by their authors. You need to get specific written permission from each and every one of them through the OTRS - see the link to the Meta page system. I can tell you that you will not get it for the majority of these, specifically the ones from commercial sites like the BBC, and individual users that have specifically copyrighted images (like FLICKR) have marked them specifically as (c) and normally don't change that. SkierRMH  ( talk ) 06:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Authority

 * Hi Rajput m16. In reply to your query on my talk page IE:-


 * ==pak==
 * Hi mate,
 * Just wanted to know who gave you the authority to fix & mend other peoples article on here?
 * Can you not consult the person before making the changes? Reply soon.
 * Thanks


 * Fix and mend is what I do :), along with many others on here. I take it you are specifically referring to the Mirpur article. If there is anything I am unsure about I either leave it, for another editor who may know or post a message on the relevant article talk page. For general advice on editing wiki take a look at:- About. Also could you please type four tildes IE:- ~ after placing a message on a talk page. That will automatically sign and date it with your name, which saves looking through the page history to see who is asking the question. :o)


 * Also with regard to uploading images, as mentioned by SkierRMH  its not a good idea to upload other people's images and claim they are yours and licence them as Public Domain (WP:PD). Wikipedia is very fussy about copyright. a number of images you uploaded have already been deleted as copyright violations. I have tagged some others, where I have found them to be taken from other websites and inserted a link to those website as confirmation of the copyright. Some were scanned images from book such as the maps you uploaded and others may be too, such as this one:- Image:Mirpur regency.jpg as it seems rather like the image representations on the hotels official website here:- |Mirpur Regency Hotel - Guestbook. You currently have the images listed below credited to you. Would you please go through them and where they are not actually yours type Author requests deletion ~ to the top of each image page?

* 11:11, 21 June 2008 Image:New honda showroom.jpg‎ (own image released into public domain) * 01:06, 7 June 2008 Image:Allama Iqbal Road, Mirpur 2.jpg‎ (own image released into public domain) * 14:02, 31 May 2008 Image:Mirpur Location.jpg‎ (own image released into public domain) * 12:53, 31 May 2008 Image:Mangla View Resort.jpg‎ (own image released into public domain) * 12:08, 26 May 2008 Image:Emblem AJK.jpg‎ (own image released into public domain) * 14:11, 25 May 2008 Image:Mirpur bazaar.jpg‎ (own image realeased into public domain) * 14:09, 25 May 2008 Image:Mirpur honda.jpg‎ (own image realeased into public domain) * 14:06, 25 May 2008 Image:Mirpur regency.jpg‎ (own image realeased into public domain) * 14:04, 25 May 2008 Image:Mirpur bazzar-001.jpg‎ (own image realeased into public domain) * 14:02, 25 May 2008 Image:Mirpur builduig-001.jpg‎ (own image realeased into public domain) * 14:01, 25 May 2008 Image:Mirpur plaza-001.jpg‎ (own image realeased into public domain) * 13:56, 25 May 2008 Image:Mirpur masjid noor-001.jpg‎ (own image realeased into public domain) * 13:48, 25 May 2008 Image:Mirpur holiday inn-001.jpg‎ (own image realeased into public domain) * 13:45, 25 May 2008 Image:Mirpur Kashmir institute of cardiology.jpg‎ (own image realeased into public domain) * 13:35, 25 May 2008 Image:Mirpur Al-Khair University-001.jpg‎ (own image realeased into public domain) * 23:35, 18 May 2008 Image:Mohammed Ajeeb.jpg‎ (own image released into public domain) * 23:16, 18 May 2008 Image:Barrister Sultan Mahmood.jpg‎ (own image released into public domain.) * 23:09, 18 May 2008 Image:Mangla dam jari kas 2-001.jpg‎ (own image released into public domain.) * 23:06, 18 May 2008 Image:BAWLI-001.jpg‎ (own image released into public domain) * 04:10, 18 May 2008 Image:Mangla Road.jpg‎ (own image released into public domain) * 03:58, 18 May 2008 Image:Hindu temple purana mirpur-001.jpg‎ (own image released into public domain)


 * That will reduce the chance of having a sysop delete them all enmass as suspect copyright violations. Richard Harvey (talk) 10:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to AAP TV. Thank you. --Jza84 | Talk  03:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Rajput
Hi Rajput, I have replied to your message on my talk page for continuity. Richard Harvey (talk) 13:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mirpur International Airport
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mirpur International Airport, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Accounting4Taste: talk 20:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Picasa Web
Hi. I see that you are uploading images from Picasa Web, such as Image:Allama Iqbal Road.jpg, with an assertion that these are are licensed under creative commons license. I've been trying to verify this, so that we can be sure we are legally free to use these images, but Picasa Web doesn't, that I can see, display any such release. Their official blog seems to indicate otherwise, as it notes that "your photographs belong to you, and you should be free to decide how to share them." The terms & services link takes us to Google's general, which includes: You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. This licence is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services. It looks as though uploaders allow reuse by Google, but I don't see that it allows reuse elsewhere by others. If you can provide a link to where on their website they release these images, that would be very helpful. Thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. If you have permission from the creator to use the images, then that needs to be noted. For instance, you might ask the creator to note the release of the image in the image description at the URL. We do have to verify permissions, since the distribution of images without permission is a matter of serious legal concern. If the creator has no problem with it, then neither does Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. Thanks for your willingness to follow through with this. Since I am far more familiar with the procedure for clearing text for re-use on Wikipedia, I am double-checking with administrators more accustomed to working images to be sure that the steps I give you are proper. I'll get back with you when I find out something definite. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * All right. As I suspected, a note at the source page is sufficient. You can have the photographer of any images at that site who have given you permission to release them note the release in their image description. In this case, at the source, Mohsin could note in the image description that the image is released (and specifically under what license). The license he chooses must allow specifically (1) modification, (2) redistribution, and (3) use for any purpose, including commercial purpose. He does have the right to request credit for the photo and to require that derivative works use the same license.


 * If he doesn't want to put it on the website, he can give you a letter to send to the Wikimedia Foundation. There are instructions for how to ask for that here. The licensing requirements are the same that I posted in the previous paragraph. You can have him fill out a standard declaration of consent with specific details. After you get this from him, you send it on to Communications Committee at permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org. They will assign it a file # and attach it to the image to verify that we are allowed to use it.


 * It's probably best if you address this person about any and all images of his that you've used at once, since permission needs to be obtained for each image. If there are other photographers whose images you've used, you should go ahead and get permission from them now, too, to avoid having images deleted as copyright violations. It's a hassle, I know, but it's necessary to keep Wikipedia in compliance with US law. :/ --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. So far as I know, none of the images that you might have acquired from that source have been tagged for deletion. If they are, they will generally be deleted a week after tagging, if the problem is not resolved. However, even if that happens, you can place a note explaining that you are verifying permissions, and that can give you a little more time. Nevertheless, I'd take care of it as quickly as possible, just to be on the safe side. If an administrator working images should happen upon them and believe that they are blatantly incorrect in tagging, they might be deleted by CSD without further notice. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Map_of_Mirpur.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Map_of_Mirpur.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:29, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mirpur International Airport
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mirpur International Airport, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Mirpur International Airport. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Accounting4Taste: talk 13:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Allama Iqbal Road.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Allama Iqbal Road.jpg, has been listed at because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 14:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AJK council logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:AJK council logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 14:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:MDA MIRPUR.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:MDA MIRPUR.jpg, has been listed at because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. With respect to this, I see that you are the creator of the image, so I presume that you are one of the individuals at that page. Just as we discussed needing proof of permission with images you've been authorized to release by other photographers, we do need proof of permission here. Please either add a release to your website or mail the communications committee with a release. Thanks! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. I don't see that the release has been added to the website. If that's where you've placed it, could you point out where on the website it is? If you've asserted authorship by mailing the communications committee, we need to leave the copyright tag on the imagine until the Wikimedia Foundation has a chance to process that mail. :) It isn't necessary to indicate that you've photoshopped the image, as long as the image and the photograph that have been modified are both yours to release. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Please stop blanking the copyright notice prior to the resolution of this. I can't find any indication on the website that this image has been released. Is there a statement to that effect somewhere at ? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * No, you need to demonstrate permission. We can't run any text or picture unless it is released under a license compatible with Wikipedia or unless it fits the fair use guidelines. I do not see any indication at the author's webpage that he permits this picture to be reused under a license that is compatible. Unless you can locate that, you either need to get the photographer to add it or to send an e-mail from an e-mail address associated with the website to the Communications Committee verifying that it can be reused. If we run copyrighted pictures without permission, we violate US law, and we risk serious legal problems for Wikipedia, as well as potentially damaging the copyright owners. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * If the website doesn't grant us the right to use it, and you can't get permission from the photographer, then the image will be deleted. If you want to try to write for permission, there are suggestions and instructions for doing so over here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * All right, then. We'll hope that they are willing to share. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:39, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

I'll see if I can figure it out. I may need you to tell me what image you mean, unless I can find it in your contribution history. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Although the deletion template mentions copyright, it seems like the image is tagged for deletion because it duplicates another image already on Wikipedia: Image:Mirpur shivala temple 01.jpg. I can't tell, but it looks like the only difference is that you may have photoshopped out a support beam or something? You'd probably be better off cropping photos if necessary but otherwise running them as they are. I don't do a lot of work with images, but I suspect that generally they are regarded as more factually accurate that way. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Only administrators can delete images and articles. If you want the first image deleted, you can tag it db-g7, which indicates to an administrator that you wish thee image to be removed. Unless he or she thinks the image is useful, he will probably delete it as a courtesy to you. But I tend to think you ought to investigate to see if Wikipedia has a policy on modifying photographs for display. As an encyclopedia, factual accuracy is important here, and I do suspect that a picture with water buffalo might be regarded as better than a picture that used to have water buffalo but had them photoshopped out. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * You're not bothering me. Wikipedia can be very complicated. :) That's why I don't know what Wikipedia's policies are for modifying photos and suggested you look into it instead of just telling you if they're okay or not. I don't work with images, unless they pop up on my copyright reviews. I'd be interested in seeing that picture, though, just for my own curiosity, if you come across it again. I glanced at Featured pictures/Places/Others, but I couldn't identify one that might have been the one you were talking about, although there is a really gorgeous London photo with a slow exposure, here. (Wow!) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

←I'm an administrator, but I do little with images, as I said, unless they come up with copyright concerns. I primarily use the admin tools to address articles that have been nominated for deletion and copyright concerns. You can see more about where I volunteer at my user page. I don't see any signs of photoshopping at. Out of curiosity, what makes you think it's been digitally altered? I'm not an image person (I don't even own a camera), but it looks like a straight photo to me. :) Probably the best place to look for assistance with that particular article is WikiProject Pakistan. Looking at the project's talk page, it seems to be fairly active. Another option, if you just want somebody to help you learn the ropes of making changes yourself, is "adoption", where you get an experienced editor to help you learn the ropes. If you're interested in that, here's more about how to locate an adopter. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, P.S.: when you decide where to ask for help with that, please remember to sign your posts on talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion by typing four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This is really helpful to other editors communicating with you. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AAP TV Logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:AAP TV Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kbc logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kbc logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Mirpur refs
Hi Rajput! Thanks for finding those refs, I've tidied the titles up and regrettably had to replace the tag for the two with a blogspot as a reflink. Blog pages are not acceptable links for references, they need to be an official source such as a national media links or library referenced source. Richard Harvey (talk) 08:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi I've just realised we are both editing at the same time. I'm doing the formatting to tidy the refs presentation up for the double column reflist to shorten the page length. If you are going to delete all the ones you can't get a suitable citation for its probably best to take them all out in one edit rather than individually. Also note the last ref you put in - Azad Kashmir website may get deleted by another editor as its not really a notable source for refs, but I will leave it alone. Richard Harvey (talk) 14:30, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Juz 'D
A tag has been placed on Juz 'D requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. mboverload @ 23:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Mirpur
Hi!, I've just spotted your message. The user has not edited again after the reversions, so far, but I will keep an eye on it. Richard Harvey (talk) 10:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)r

Notability of Dr Shabir Choudhry
A tag has been placed on Dr Shabir Choudhry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  00:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Maz MC
A tag has been placed on Maz MC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Cycle~ (talk) 02:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tariq Mehmood (writer)
A tag has been placed on Tariq Mehmood (writer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Cycle~ (talk) 01:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Mirpur, Pakistan

 * Hi Rajput! As the Tariq Mehmood article has been deleted (see above) I have de-redlinked his name in the Notable People from New Mirpur section of the article page and also replaced the reference you provided with a more notable one from the Guardian Newspaper, which is a review of one of his books by Mike Phillips's. Must say I'm surprised by the Speedy delete! Tariq Mehmood co-directed Injustice, a feature documentary dealing with deaths in police custody, which won the 2002 Black Film Maker Best Documentary Award. His first novel, Hand on the Sun, was published by Penguin and other books are available through Amazon and elswhere. Did you know you can see and read one of his illustrated childrens books online, via Google Book Search; See:- Half brother. Richard Harvey (talk) 09:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Rachyals
Oops! we seem to be double editing again! :) Richard Harvey (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I've finished, I saw the inclusion of the details in Mirpur, Pakistan and thought it was new info, so moved it into Rachyals. It is better left in the Rachyals article as it is relevant to them as opposed to Jats in particular. To move it out would cause a prevalence to move the other clans details as well. That would make those stubs too small and eventually lead to them being deleted altogether. Whereas there is a potential to enlarge the stubs with greater information. Richard Harvey (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Sheikh Younas Azam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheikh Younas Azam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sheikh Younas Azam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  D Big X ray  09:53, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maneel


The article Maneel has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * There may not be any third party secondary sources on the subject. Please see WP:V "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OrangesRyellow (talk) 07:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Mirpur shivala temple 02.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mirpur shivala temple 02.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shrine of Meeran Shah-001.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Shrine of Meeran Shah-001.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gunnex (talk) 23:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Considering copyvio (cropped: watermark removed + 2008 exif fake) via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/4747272 (2007, © All rights reserved by "Ghulam Abbas"). --Gunnex (talk) 23:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mirpur staduim 33.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Mirpur staduim 33.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gunnex (talk) 23:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Considering copyvio (man removed/photoshopped) via http://www.geocities.ws/furqan2002/mirpur_pics/mirpur_pics.htm (+/- 2002) = http://www.geocities.ws/furqan2002/mirpur_pics/CAFE.gif. --Gunnex (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Chowk Shaheedan.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Chowk Shaheedan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gunnex (talk) 23:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Considering (2008) copyvio (man+div. photoshopped) via http://www.iftynet.co.uk/photo.htm ("This site was last updated 11/07/05") = http://www.iftynet.co.uk/Picture%20405.jpg (identical exif, last modified: 2005). --Gunnex (talk) 23:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Villas in Mirpur.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Villas in Mirpur.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gunnex (talk) 23:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Considering copyvio (false claim of authorship/license/etc.) via File:Typical Homes in Mirpur.JPG (2007, by "Freakymangoe"). --Gunnex (talk) 23:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Allama Iqbal Road, Mirpur 2.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Allama Iqbal Road, Mirpur 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gunnex (talk) 23:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Considering copyvio (2008 exif fake + cropped) via http://www.krrc.org/pictures/mirpurinpictures.htm (wayback to 2002 available, Copyright © 2001, Kashmir Record & Research Council (KRRC)) = http://www.krrc.org/pictures/Mirpur/allamaiqbalroadmirpur.jpg (last modified: 02.2008). --Gunnex (talk) 23:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mangla View Resort.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Mangla View Resort.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gunnex (talk) 23:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Considering copyvio (resized) via grabbed from Internet. Btw, not "own work" of the "Mangla View Resort" in Pakistan. The photo shows the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam / Netherlands. --Gunnex (talk) 23:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hindu temple purana mirpur-001.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Hindu temple purana mirpur-001.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gunnex (talk) 23:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Considering (2008) copyvio (cropped: watermark removed) via http://www.pbase.com/hgharib/mandirs (Google Cache: +/- 2005) = http://www.pbase.com/hgharib/image/86828079 (© Gharib Hanif) = http://m9.i.pbase.com/o6/30/553830/1/86828079.X0TblI5P.mirpurmandir7r.jpg. --Gunnex (talk) 23:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ali Adnan Ibrahim for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Adnan Ibrahim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ali Adnan Ibrahim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  18:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ch Muhammed Saeed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ch Muhammed Saeed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ch Muhammed Saeed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  18:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Karam Hussain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karam Hussain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Karam Hussain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  18:39, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Shamas Rehman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shamas Rehman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shamas Rehman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  18:45, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ali Adnan Ibrahim


A tag has been placed on Ali Adnan Ibrahim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 00:42, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ch Muhammed Saeed


A tag has been placed on Ch Muhammed Saeed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 00:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Chowk Shaheedan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chowk Shaheedan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chowk Shaheedan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  08:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Mirpur Location.jpg


The file File:Mirpur Location.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused. Low quality. Superseded by pushpin map at Mirpur, Azad Kashmir."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 01:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)