User talk:Rajput of Garhwal

Rajputization
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rajputization, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Please do not remove sourced information from any wikipedia page. Please discuss on talk page if you have concerns. Thanks LukeEmily (talk) 19:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

The information published by you about rajputs of uttarakhand divisions garhwal and kumaon are not accurate. Yes there were 2-3 khas caste that were in this process but you have written as if all of rajputs of our region are rajputised which is not at all true. We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs and the rajputised ones are still considered to low social status so please publish the right information because we have problem with this one. Rajput of Garhwal (talk) 05:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Rajputisation
The information published by you about rajputs of uttarakhand divisions garhwal and kumaon are not accurate. Yes there were 2-3 khas caste that were in this process but you have written as if all of rajputs of our region are rajputised which is not at all true. We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs and the rajputised ones are still considered of low social status so please publish the right information. Rajput of Garhwal (talk) 05:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Caste promotion
You have twice removed well-sourced content at Rajputisation without giving any source for your opinion. The first time your edit summary was quite alarming, suggesting caste promotion motives behind your edits. Rajputisation is now under extended confirmed protection, which means that inexperienced users such as you are not able to edit it. However, I see other similar edits to less high-profile pages that are specifically concerned with Uttarakhand, such as this and this, both of which I have reverted as unsourced. Wikipedia goes by reliable sources, not your personal opinion or my personal opinion. Such edits do harm, especially on less well-watched pages. I notice also your username, and your doubled (?) response to LukeEmily above, both of which suggest you are on Wikipedia for the purpose of promoting your own caste ("We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs", etc). I have therefore topic banned you from all caste-related pages and edits, see below. Bishonen &#124; tålk 08:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC).

Speedy deletion of User:Rajput of Garhwal


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Rajput of Garhwal has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bishonen &#124; tålk 08:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)