User talk:Raju Babu/Archives/2024/March

Gratitude



 * Thankyou so much Mr. Nepaboy for your Outstanding Translation effort!


 * I very very Grateful.


 * May you prosper !


 * (If you want your favorite article(s) to be translated into the Chinese language, then I can help you.)


 * Yours Sincerely, --Jose77 ०३:२९, १० अगस्त २०१० (UTC)


 * Could you also help me translate the rest of this article into the Bhojpuri Devanagari script? please.
 * Your help would be appreciated with full Gratitude.


 * (ps: I will also try and find some fellow Wikipedians to support your request). --Jose77 ०३:४३, १० अगस्त २०१० (UTC)


 * ✅ The favorite article that you requested has been translated and created Here. You are welcome. --Jose77 (talk) 04:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Other projects
Please be aware that content such as Articles of Sugauli treaty would go better on our sibling project Wikisource. What you submitted was not an article about the treaty; rather, it is the treaty.

No harm done; this is just so you know what to do next time. DS (talk) 12:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Help with Bhojpuri language
Good day! Could you help me and provide translations for the following 100 basic word in Bhojpuri in your native local variety (dialect) (and indicate please precise location like state – district – town/village). If there are synonyms or known dialectal variants provide them with comments if possible. Also please indicate if you know that certain words are borrowing. You can fill in right here or at my page using either IPA transcription or any other spelling you like (just describe your conventions). Thank you in advance! --Koryakov Yuri (talk) 11:20, 19 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I, me – अमी
 * thou (you, singular) – तोहोर
 * we – अमार
 * Cunt - भोँसडी
 * this – ईथे
 * that – काँ
 * who? – काँव
 * what? – का
 * not – ना
 * all –
 * many –
 * one –
 * two –
 * big – लौण्डा
 * long – बडका
 * small – पिद्दू
 * woman – मौगी
 * man (adult male) – मरद
 * man (human being) –
 * fish –
 * bird –
 * dog – कुतउ
 * louse – ढील
 * tree –
 * seed –
 * leaf –
 * root –
 * bark (of a tree) –
 * skin –
 * meat (flesh) –
 * blood –
 * bone –
 * fat – मोटका
 * egg –
 * horn –
 * tail –
 * feather (of a bird) –
 * hair –
 * head –
 * ear –
 * eye –
 * nose –
 * mouth –
 * tooth –
 * tongue –
 * claw (nail) –
 * foot –
 * knee –
 * hand –
 * belly –
 * neck –
 * breast(s) (of a woman) –
 * heart –
 * liver –
 * drink (verb) –
 * eat (verb) –
 * bite (verb) –
 * see (verb) –
 * hear (verb) –
 * know (verb) –
 * sleep (verb) –
 * die (verb) –
 * kill (verb) –
 * swim (verb) –
 * fly (verb) –
 * walk/go (verb) –
 * come (verb) –
 * lie (down) (verb) –
 * sit (verb) –
 * stand (verb) –
 * give (verb) –
 * say (verb) –
 * sun –
 * moon –
 * star –
 * water –
 * rain –
 * stone –
 * sand –
 * earth –
 * cloud –
 * smoke –
 * fire –
 * ash –
 * burn (trans. verb) –
 * road (path) –
 * mountain –
 * red –
 * green –
 * yellow –
 * white –
 * black –
 * night –
 * warm (hot) –
 * cold –
 * full –
 * new –
 * good –
 * round –
 * dry –
 * name –

Orphaned non-free image File:British India Map of 1785.pdf
 Thanks for uploading File:British India Map of 1785.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:57, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:British India Map of 1804.pdf
 Thanks for uploading File:British India Map of 1804.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:57, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Do not try to obfuscate subject matter of articles by creating duplicate pages with misleading titles
Hello Mr. Ganesh Singh Katuwal (aka Nepaboy),

Please do not create new pages with similar-sounding but misleading names and move contents of existing pages just because you do not like the existing titles and want to obfuscate the subject matter by creating duplicate pages with misleading titles. You created a new page "Greater Nepal (Concept)" without any discussion and moved the existing page "Greater Nepal" there. I shall appreciate you do not act arbitrarily and unilaterally like this.

You then created a new page "Unified Nepal" though an article "Unification of Nepal" already exists. The new article "Unified Nepal" is badly written, has numerous language errors and factual errors in addition to verbose and POV content and is entirely redundant. I have redirected it to the existing article "Unification of Nepal".

Rao Ravindra (talk) 17:33, 15 March 2013 (UTC) Ravindra Rao


 * Hello, You have written "When Nepal attacked on Garhwal, Kumaon, Sikkim, these were not part of India but these were independent Kingdom." Yes, they were kingdoms. Yes, they were independent. But independent of what or whom? And not part of India? Not part of which India? India is an omnibus word that can be described in dozens of ways and can have different meanings for different persons. India generally included all the area up to the peaks of Himalayas in the regions where Ganga and Yamuna rivers originated. Sharda (or Kali or Mahakali) river was always a part of India. India's boundary has varied so much over the ages and with numerous kings that its hundreds of boundaries over the ages cannot be shown in one map. In Maurya era, India included Gandhar (now Kandhar and Herat, Afghanistan). In Moghul and Maratha era, there were kings (Maharajas) and kingdoms (Rajya) in India that were "independent" in their internal affairs but the Moghuls and the Marathas had suzerainty over them.

Therefore an assertion that Garhwal and Kumaon "were not part of India" is invalid. They were independent kingdoms in the omnibus India just as Maharaja Ranjit Singh's was an independent kingdom in Punjab region of India. Would any sane person claim that the independent Sikh kingdom was not in India? It is surrealistic nostalgia to say that Nepal as it exists now has a claim over Garhwal and Kumaon when nascent Nepal kingdom of Prithvi Narayan Shah in 1790s and the following decade occupied them briefly for 10 to 25 years before losing them two centuries ago. Even the ancestors of Prithvi Narayan Shah had moved to Gorkha area from what is now Rajasthan. They were not "original inhabitants" of Gorkha area.

And remember that for long periods (centuries) the Kumaon kingdom included areas east of Sharda or Kali river - areas which are now part of Republic of Nepal. But no one in India raises any claim that these areas should be "returned" by Nepal to India because just a claim would be as ridiculous as the claim by leftist and communist Nepalese over Kumaon and Garhwal is. China is mentoring them to disturb Indo-Nepal relations. Do not fall in China's trap. The King of Nepal signed another treaty in 1860 accepting the revised boundaries after the British returned a part of Terai to him.

Ravindra Rao Rao Ravindra (talk) 15:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:British India Map of 1785.pdf
Thanks for uploading File:British India Map of 1785.pdf. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Administrative divisions of Nepal
 * added links pointing to Nepali, Ilam, Sagarmatha, Koshi, Jumla and Mahendranagar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mid-Western Development Region, Nepal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Magar and Tihar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madhesi people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mithila. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Anglo-Nepalese War into Greater Nepal. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Sagarmatha Highway
I am afraid I have removed most of the article, because it has been directly copied from the two newspaper articles that the article references. You can't directly copy text from unfree sources to Wikipedia, not even with attribution; this constitutes a copyright violation. The exception is when a quotation is needed to demonstrate a point that the article makes; in this case the article must make it clear that the text is a quotation. See the copyright and the fair use policy.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Sagarmatha Highway article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Chaudandigadhi
Hi, I'm Boleyn. गणेश कक्षे, thanks for creating Chaudandigadhi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 09:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Triyuga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dharan ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Triyuga check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Triyuga?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Belaka
Hi, I'm Boleyn. गणेश कक्षे, thanks for creating Belaka!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 06:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:British India Map of 1785.pdf


A tag has been placed on File:British India Map of 1785.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Fundamental Rights and Duties in Nepal
Hi, I'm Abishe. गणेश कक्षे, thanks for creating Fundamental Rights and Duties in Nepal!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Happy Holidays text.png Hello गणेश कक्षे: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 14:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 14:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Administrative divisions of Nepal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Administrative_divisions_of_Nepal check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Administrative_divisions_of_Nepal?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Itahari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koshi ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Itahari check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Itahari?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Rautamai) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Rautamai, Raju Babu!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please do not add redlinked categories. Thanks for creating this."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Udayapur District ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Udayapur_District check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Udayapur_District?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Iname, Jante, Belka and Lekhgaun

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Administration in Province No. 1 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Administration_in_Province_No._1 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Administration_in_Province_No._1?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Koshi, Rong, Likhu, Haldibari, Bhokraha, Kerabari and Lamidanda

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Udayapur District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhojpur District ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Udayapur_District check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Udayapur_District?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Regarding Maze Solution
"Dear Kiran Ji, I want to know if the Maze Solution is your company and you are the copyright holder of all the maps uploaded by you?Raju Babu (talk) 16:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)" With regards to your message, I want to inform you that Maze Solution is indeed my company and since we couldn't find any map of districts of Nepal showing old and new municipalities we created them for public knowledge and use. Unfortunately some one has marked all of them for copyright violations and deletions. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiran215 (talk • contribs) 02:31, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Udayapur District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belka ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Udayapur_District check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Udayapur_District?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of roads in Nepal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lalitpur District ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_roads_in_Nepal check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_roads_in_Nepal?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of gaupalikas of Nepal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Likhu, Sunkoshi and Miklajung ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_gaupalikas_of_Nepal check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_gaupalikas_of_Nepal?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chhathar


The article Chhathar has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: No references and no text.

Please provide references and text, and then remove this PROD tag.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:User:Raju Babu/Infobox
Template:User:Raju Babu/Infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Gandaki Pradesh.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Gandaki Pradesh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of gaunpalikas of Nepal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Byans ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_gaunpalikas_of_Nepal check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_gaunpalikas_of_Nepal?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Logo of Khumbu Pasanglhamu.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Indic script
Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Siwan, Bihar, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:37, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Happy Dashain!
 Namaste, Raju Babu, and Happy Dashain! WikiProject Nepal wishes you a wonderful Dashain filled with joy, love, and happiness. Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great Dashain! Cheers. Message sent by on behalf of WikiProject Nepal. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Kamalbazar Municipality a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Cheers, Polyamorph (talk) 21:15, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Can you help me to move all the pages that includes "Municipality" word after city names? Just need to remove "Municipality" word from the page title. Here is the category: Category:Municipalities of Nepal. Thank you--- 👤 Raju 💌 04:30, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge
 Namaste, ! You are cordially invited to join the new  Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Nepal. You are invited to join the new, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 article creations. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for Nepal on Wikipedia! Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by using:  ~ Thanks.

Go to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nepal in data


A tag has been placed on Nepal in data, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 04:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

WP:NOTAFORUM
Hi Raju Babu, I am uncomfortable with this post of yours at Talk:Kalapani territory.

It is WP:SOAPBOXing and treating an article's talk page as a WP:FORUM. Can you please remove it and move it to your user space? I will be happy to comment on it, but not at the article talk page.

Pinging for his view. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree and will remove the post. Raju Babu, your post is not appropriate because it violates WP:FORUM. Could you please restate your concerns in short, actionable posts? Thanks. --regentspark (comment) 14:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I know but I just wanted to tell you that there are facts that you have not given a space on your article. I also told you before that you have written the whole article in view of your point, so please do some research and give space those facts in your article and remove the usless things from article which is unnecessarily there.--- 👤 Raju 💌 17:03, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * As I said, you are welcome to put it in your userspace and we can discuss it.
 * On the article talk page itself, you are always welcome to raise issues with the article content. Unfortunately, we are getting very little information from the Nepalese, only commentaries. It is almost as if Nepal went into hibernation in 1817 and suddenly woke up in 1996. What happened in between? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

During the time of British rule on subcontinent, most of south asian kingdom had no more knowledge about mapping and sketching maps. Nepal also had no engineers and printing department and knowledge about maps. Britishers had changed their maps time by time but Nepal did not know about that. Nepal has only those maps which were drawn by britishers but signed in mutual agreement. Nepal has a map of Mahakali Zone which was signed between Britishers and Nepal in 1934. This was last map signed in mutual agreement with Britishers. In this map all villages until Limpiyadhura has shown in Mahakali zone and the Kali (Kuti) river is shown as borderline between India and Nepal. Nepal has receiving paper of tax which were paid by people of those villages in 1938 (Nepali date: Asadh 19, 1995), Land tax paid in 1940. Nepal also has Voter name list which were asked for 1980 Nepalese governmental system referendum.

There was no any dispute there until Independence of India. During Independence time of India, there was political issues in Nepal. Nepali Congress Party started revolution of 1951 with help of India and the power of King shifted back to shah king and finally ended the Rana regime. Shah king was restablished by help of Nehru so King always was not in position to go agains of India. Promulgation of constitution in Nepal, 1962 war between India and China, permission to India to deploy Indian army on northern border of Nepal etc. After war Nepal asked to remove army from Northern border of Nepal then India removed all army from Northern border of Nepal but did not removed from Kalapani area saying let the army remain there for few days to keep eye on China but Indian army is not removed from there untill today. During 1996 Nepali people made pressure to remove those army from Kalapani then the issue of dispute came in light and from then discussion is going on till today.

If you want references about what I told here I can provide you but mostly are in Nepali language and the map and voter name list and other proofs are saved in archive with government. One receipt of tax has been made in public which is available with this reference

Nepal had no printing department until 1975 (Nepali year 2032). In 1988 A team of survey department was about to go to the Kalapani area but India made objection and said Kalapani is a disputed area.

In 1961, during Nepal-China border agreement Kalapani area was left so in 1988 Nepal government told to make Lipu-Gad international borderline between India and Nepal for now.

From that time to now many time India and Nepal sitting in meeting but no solution untill today. On 20 May of 2020 Nepal Government finally told to include whole Kalapani area in Nepal when she knew there is construction work is going on in disputed territory. --- 👤 Raju 💌 21:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Frankly, this whole obsession with maps is entirely counter-productive. It doesn't mean a thing. It looks like Buddhi Narayan Shrestha started this whole business. He went and researched the British archives and American archives, but he only copied maps. He didn't read anything! If he did, he hasn't written about it.
 * Territory doesn't get owned or disowned by virtue of maps. Maps are only a record of what has been decided. They are not decisions in themselves.
 * So the theory that the British acquired territory just by printing maps is false. There would have been negotiations and decisions made by responsible officials. In the case of "Kalapani territory", I believe Jung Bahadur Rana was responsible for the transfer, which was contemporaneous with the transfer of Naya Muluk. The area to the west of Kalapani was never under the control of Nepal. You are welcome to read the travelogue of Henry Strachey (explorer) that I posted on Talk:Kalapani territory. He travelled to Tibet via Lympiadhura and returned via Lipulekh and included copious detail of everything he encountered along the route. There is not a single mention of Nepal being involved.
 * As for the evidence available in the Nepal government archives, we can't use it. It has to throw the archives open to disinterested scholars (who could even be Nepalese, but maintaining academic standards) and then we can use their analysis. Note that paying taxes to Nepalese government could have been for the land the people owned on the Nepalese side. (This was one of the arguments advanced for retaining Tinkar Valley within India in 1817.) The Byansis were also paying "taxes" to the Tibetans, but it was apparently in lieu of trading duties. The British were pretty unhappy with the arrangement. But when they tried to change it, it backfired. So they let it continue. So we can't interpret these things. It has to be done by knowledgeable scholars. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

What is your opinion on it: "'It was britishers who interchanged the names of white Kali (an small stream of water near a temple, which water is not black) and blakish Kuti (real Kali) rivers. This ensured a vast area of land as british territory as Kali river was always accepted as the border.- a good example of British practical diplomacy. They built the above temple (a temple of Goddess Kali) to authenticate the name.'" --- 👤 Raju 💌 11:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Stories like this, explaining how clever the British were in doing this or that, are not at all uncommon in India. It is also no uncommon for travel writers like Harish Kapadia to add them to their narratives in order to juice up what would otherwise be drab geography. If we are going to accuse the British of lying, we need to have reasonable evidence, not rumour.
 * I have not yet seen anything that gives me confidence that the British messed up. At the same time, I place a lot of weight on the fact this was discussed in 1817 itself. The Nepalese made a claim to Kuthi Yankti and the British presented their argument, which was apparently accepted. To me, that settles the matter. It can be reopened only if the Nepalese are able to explain why the 1817 settlement wasn't good enough. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Captain Webb
Ok, so our conversation spurred me into looking more at Webb's information to see if he had lied. There was plenty in the Historical Records of Survey of India volume, from where the map came:

So the "source of the river Kalee" was past "Kalapanee" at "pass Lebong" (Lipulekh). The place where he met the Chinese Governor is what he marked on his map as "Mandarin's camp" (which later got corrupted to "Mandarim camp"). It wasn't its name, which Strachey mentioned 30 years later. He apparently went up to Lipulekh in one stretch without stopping at the camp, and so got totally exhausted by the time they reached the pass.

So, all rumours of hera pheri are false. We can rest assured. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:42, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * It is also worth noting the date, 7 June 1816. This was a year before the Nepalese government raised a dispute about it. (At that time, the Tinkar Valley was also under British control, perhaps using a liberal interpretation of "River Kalee".) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * You know where Lebong pass is?

It is between Darma valley (Dhauli river) and Vyas valley (Kuti river) at height of 5500m. He went to source of Kali river (Kuti yangti) passing lebong pass. --- 👤 Raju 💌 20:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * You may be right. Webb didn't know the name "Lipulekh" for some reason. In his letters he called it the "Taklakot pass" and in the map it is marked as the "Pass to Chinese Tartary". So, there is no reason why he would call it "Lebong". But the Survey of India people interpreted it as Lipulekh (footnote [6]). I will have to dig more. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

I was never crazy for History and geography but this issue made me excited to know the matter from past to now but I thought might be everything not available on internet but I should check once then I started to search old british maps and I also searched old names and I found that Limpiyadhura (Lankpya-Dhura) was the source of Kali river and Kali was the real name of the Kuti Yangti. Early time Neo Dhura and Lankpya dhura were the passes from where mostly Bhotiyas used to trade. Very few had known about Lipulek pass. When Britishers knew about Lipulekh pass they started Cartographic propaganda. I found I was correct what I was thinking after reading this article. .--- 👤 Raju 💌 05:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I had seen this paper too. But I had "lost" it in my files before I could take notes on it. I did copy some of its maps though. When I wrote this a couple of days ago, I was looking at the Webb's map copied from here, but didn't remember where it came from. By the way, it is a good idea to write WP:Full citations even during talk discussions so that they will show up searches. Plain url's won't.
 * As for the Lipulekh pass, it is clearly the easiest and most convenient pass (for access to Taklakot and Kailas-Manasarowar). But apparently the Tibetans didn't like people coming through it. During the Baz Bahadur Chand's rule, he invaded Taklakot and forced the Tibetans to open it for pilgrims. So the Kumaonis have some kind of title to it. But after the Kumaonis went down (through Gorka invasion), Tibetans probably took the control back. That is why the "Mandarin's camp" ended up below the pass, and Strachey had to go out via the Lampiya pass and return through the Lipu pass.
 * By the way, India is not contesting the fact that the maps between 1819 and 1857 showed Kuthi Yankti as the Kali River. I will work on a new section on the Source of Kali, where all this stuff can be discussed. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, the "Mount Lebon" is marked on Webb's map, though it was removed in the published version of the map. So, yes, cartographic propaganda, it is. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

1817
The paper you mentioned above is really poor. It mixes up a lot of stuff, gives fake citations and makes loads of innuendo. There is a later paper co-authored with Dhungel which is more reasonable. This says that Chautaria Bum Shah asked in 1817 for a transfer of villages "east of Kali". So, until this point, Tinkar Valley was under British control. (Webb had included it in his survey, but not the areas south of it.) The Governor General decided that Nepal had a right to the lands "east of Kali" and ordered they be transferred. Commissioner Trail then said that Changru and Tinkar were the only villages to the east of Kali that needed to be transferred but their land was generally owned by the 'zamindars' residing to the west of Kali, and forwarded a petition from the zamindars. So, it seems that Traill decided that the Kalapani river was Kali. There is no information as to Webb had any input into this. By 1817, Webb was back in Garhwal, surveying the Gangotri area. And his maps/reports were not submitted to the Survey of India till 1819. Soon afterwards he left India never to return.

So from this point till 1846 the British lived with the inconsistency that their maps said one thing and the border said another. It is unclear whether anybody noticed the inconsistency. In 1846, Strachey travelled in the area, with a map, and he mentioned the inconsistency. After this, the maps seem to have been corrected in line with the actual practice.

So, it seems to me that we are back to square-A. The decisions were made based on what was considered (or claimed) to be the local nomenclature. Webb's maps had no impact on them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Lol. When there was rule of Gorkha in Kumaon. The villages of Tinkar and Chhangru were the part of Doti Pargana as the geographical condition of land separates it from Byas Parganah and Byas Pargana was divided by Kali so called Kuti river. The Zamindar of eastern villages was residing another side of river so he never wanted to be lost his land across the river. This is why Bum Shah requested to comissioner to surrender the half of Byas pargana to Nepal. That time there was no issue of river that which is original Kali, if there could, Zamindar had mentioned in his letter when he wrote a letter to concerned person.
 * The Kali temple is built later to give name to a small stream of water which is sourcing there. The area where the temple was/is situated, there are no residencies so why do soneone go to make a small temple there? Although It can be tested archeologically when the temple was buit there.
 * The area was being ruled by Gorkhas so Gorkhas knows better which is Kali river and what is the reality of Temple. How did Gorkhas not know if Lipu Gad was the real Kali, they were ruler there just before 1816? Who will decide which is original kali who just came after 1816?
 * If they knew that Lipu Gad is original Kali in 1845, why they did not overtook the area? Evidences proves Nepalese ruled there untill 1905. Why did they not write a latter to Government of Nepal to handover the area? How independent India let Nepalese go the area to take a pole in 1961?
 * In 1962, when India lost a war with China losing a big chunk of land to them, they captured an small portion of Nepal to give satisfaction to their own and this is the truth.--- 👤 Raju 💌 06:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)


 * No, I don't think that's how it is. Byas (Beans) pargannah from Kumaon at the time would be Beans/Kuthi valley in Pithoragarh together with the Byash/Byans VDC which currently forms part of Byans Rural Municipality. This is the area where Byangsi language is spoken and includes the villages of Budhi, Garbyang, Gunji, Nabi, Napalchchu, Rongkong, Kuti, Chhangru and Tinkar.
 * Moving within this area would be much more simpler than coming into this area from outside. From India, you may be able to take some route through the passes between Darma Valley and Beans valley, like Lebong Pass / Sin La or the Nama Pass. However, in Nepal there is an amphitheater of peaks along the watershed boundary of Api Khola, Nampa Khola and Tinkar Khola, defining the Byangsi speaking area. This line of peaks makes it nigh on impractical to enter this area any other way except going upstream along the Kali river valley. See this for reference.
 * Also, we have the following passages from Henry Strachey, where he refers to the Tinkar valley not being in the British territory unlike the rest of the Byans district/pargannah. He makes it clear that the neighbouring Marma valley was in the Doti pargannah/district.
 * This is where he refers as to why Tinkar valley was so remote.
 * -- Ashinpt (talk) 21:03, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * -- Ashinpt (talk) 21:03, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks . I hope wouldn't mind your intervention. But I have highlighted the "mistake" part in your Strachey quote. I believe that "mistake" is the cause of all these disputes now. Similar mistakes in Kashmir/Ladakh have also given rise to the present day Sino-Indian troubles. Barring a few exceptions, the British generally took care of their Imperial interests and didn't worry much about how the decisions affected the people. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

1820 & 1842
, to make you satisfied that Kuti was the real Kali river, I have found these two links. If you will even not accept it, I will know that you don't want to understand it.
 * A geographical, statistical, and historical description of Hindostan and the adjacent countries, Volume 2 was a journal published in 1820 by Walter Hamilton. He writes describing about the Kingdom of Nepal: Nepal is separated from Tibet by Himalayas in the north; on the south it is bounded by the british territories in the provinces of Delhi, Oudh, Bihar and Bengal with the exception of about 60 miles belonging to the Nawab of Oudh which intervene; in the east Nepal territories are separated those of the british by the mechi river from whence to the Himalaya mountains they are bounded by the principality Sikkim, which extends north to the chinese frontier; to the west limits are accurately defined by the course of the Cali (The western branch of gogra), beyond which is the british district of Kumaun


 * The encyclopedia Britannica or Dictionary of arts, Sciences and general literature: Volume 16. January 1, 1842 by Adam and charles black Cali (The western branch of gogra), beyond which is the british district of Kumaun.--- 👤 Raju 💌 13:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Don't be silly. "Gogra", which the Indians spell as Ghaghra is the Indian name of Karnali. This is saying that Kali is its "western branch" of that river. Many contemporary sources of that time point out that Kali was also called Ghaghra/Gogra, despite being only one branch of it. This has nothing to do with Kuthi Yankti. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:26, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * And the map above just a copy of Webb's map made by Kumaon's assistant commissioner. It doesn't have any borders marked because Webb's map didn't have it either. Surveyors generally don't invent their own borders. They only mark agreed borders, if they know them. When Webb did his survey, the border was still under discussion. The border was finally drawn on a scale map by Henry Strachey in 1846/1849. That map is available on pahar.in. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:31, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry I misunderstood. I thought West Gogra is West Kali.
 * If the drawing finally drawn in 1846/1849, why do again the drawing changed later until 1924? --- 👤 Raju 💌 15:27, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't understand what you are asking. This copy was made for J. H. Batten, the Asst. Commissioner of Kumaon. He seems to have ordered it in 1846 and it got made on 13 June 1849. All copies had to be made by hand. There were no photocopiers in the 19th century.
 * Henry Strachey's travel report was published in 1848. So the Surveyor's office knew that the name of Kali for Kuthi Yanki was "practically wrong". So they labelled it "West Kalee". I have no idea where the name "Sama" comes from. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Why did the British change the border?
Re-reading your message, I understood what you were asking. I can only speculate because I haven't seen anything written about it. But the clues are present in various places.
 * Until Henry Strachey's trip, the Lipulekh pass wasn't used because the Tibetans didn't allow people through it. Neither was there any Kalapani village. There was no Nepali presence or administration there either. The Nepalese made an attempt in 1817 to get the Kuthi valley but the British rejected it. The Bhotiyas might have used the Lipu pass for their trade but the Byansis really preferred the Lampiya pass which was closer to their villages. So the Lipu pass might have been used by the Byansis of Tinkar and the Chaudansis.
 * After Strachey's trip, some interest might have developed in opening up the Lipu pass. Perhaps some pilgrims to Kailas-Manasarovar started going by this route. (Strachey himself mentions two people, Hindu sanyasis, who attempted to go. The Tibetans allowed one of them but not the other.) So if the British managed to get the pass opened, the pilgrimage traffic would have started pretty soon. Along with the pilgrimage traffic, a village would have grown up at Kalapani because it is a convenient stopping place.
 * By 1855, when Jang Bahadur Rana got the power in Nepal, he developed good relations with the British and made another attempt to get the Kuthi valley. The 1855 map that Buddhi Narayan Shrestha copied from the British Library, which says "compiled by Survey of India", wasn't prepared by Survey of India. It isn't a suvey map in the first place, and, secondly, why would Survey of India prepare a map of "Nipal and countries adjoining"? It was either prepared by Rana or the British Resident or both of them jointly, in order to get some idea of Nepal's territories. They could have borrowed draughtsmen from the Survey of India or hired some free-lancers. We have been shown only one section of the whole map, the part that adjoins Kumaon. But the rest of it would have also been drawn.
 * The important point is that this map shows a border. It in fact shows two border lines, one on the watershed to the south of Kuthi Yankti, and a second to the south of Darma Yankti (or Dhauli). I have no idea how Shrestha could have missed them. He probably knows them but he doesn't care to explain them. Shrestha also found a note from Rana which says, among others, that such a border would be agreeable to Nepal. The second important point is that the proposed border was along a watershed, not the river itself. By 1850s the borders of Kashmir and Ladakh were defined, and there was consensus that borders should be on watersheds. What happened to Rana's demand? The British probably put it on ice.
 * Next the Indian Rebellion happened in 1857. Rana allied with the British and helped them suppress the rebellion in Lucknow. The British had to show their gratitude. But, instead of giving him the Kuthi valley, they gave him the western Tarai. They probably found administering the Malaria-infested jungles a pain but it was a good deal for Rana and a good deal for Nepal, because the majority of Nepal's income came from the Tarai. A new treaty was signed. If they had their wits right, the British should have put Kalapani in the treaty, but either the idea didn't occur to them yet or they thought it didn't need to be mentioned in a treaty. Since Rana pushed them to the idea of the watershed, they decided they would use the watershed of the Kalapani river on the east. In their view, it didn't violate the 1816 treaty, because the Kali River formed only after Kalapani. Above it, there were only headwaters. The argument probably originated with the Almora district officials, but it was accepted by the Survey of India around 1865 and it has been put into the maps since then.
 * But all this fiddling with the maps didn't make any difference on the ground. On the ground, the Kalapani area and the Lipulekh pass were under the British administration ever since 1815. The change of border that occurred in 1865 is for unpopulated area. So Nepal didn't lose anything nor gain anything.
 * The real loss happened only after 1997, when the Lipulekh pass got reopened. Henry Strachey makes a very subtle and important point, which was told to him by a "Tinker" (I presume a Tinkar resident). There aren't enough people in the Tinkar Valley to beat down the snow along the route to the Tinkar Pass. When Lipulekh was closed, all the Bhotiyas of the region used the Tinkar pass, and so the problem would have been solved. After Lipulekh got opened, the Indian Bhotiyas use the Lipulekh pass and nobody goes to the Tinkar Pass. Moreover, because of all the politicking and the tensions, the Indian government won't allow the Nepalese Bhotiyas to go to Kalapani/Lipulekh. The more noise Nepal makes, the more the Tinkar people will suffer.
 * So the right thing for the Nepalese to do to help the Tinkar people is to make peace. I have no hopes that they will do so however. Nationalism is a drug. Once you taste it, you only want more and more of it. You will never let go. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The same thing you are doing. Nationalism is in your mind this is why you made so long speech. If Nepal says she has proofs of cencus 1961 of Kalapani area. Land taxes received by villages of that area. The approve map of that area between British & Nepal then why Govt. of India ignores and not come to talk on table, when Govt. of India talking with China on border issue. Because India has no proof to make a claim on the land. India govt. is saying talk will be proceed after end of Corona time.
 * The same thing you are doing. Nationalism is in your mind this is why you made so long speech. If Nepal says she has proofs of cencus 1961 of Kalapani area. Land taxes received by villages of that area. The approve map of that area between British & Nepal then why Govt. of India ignores and not come to talk on table, when Govt. of India talking with China on border issue. Because India has no proof to make a claim on the land. India govt. is saying talk will be proceed after end of Corona time.

https://nagariknews.nagariknetwork.com/politics/224271-1590805208.html India should talk on this matter and should make a solution. That land is not so important for Nepal, Nepal can officially handover to India but there should be start of talk.--- 👤 Raju 💌 07:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * https://kathmandupost.com/politics/2019/12/05/no-progress-on-initiating-talks-with-india-on-kalapani-issue
 * https://m.thewire.in/article/diplomacy/india-nepal-kalapani-dispute-foreign-minister.
 * People of Nabhi and Gunji used to pay their tax visiting darchula untill Bikram samvat 2035 (Gregorian date 1978)
 * Sorry, I wasn't giving a "speech". I was answering a query you asked. Perhaps it was just a rhetorical question and you weren't expecting an answer. In that case, I won't bother writing here. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of National Paddy Day
Hello! Your submission of National Paddy Day at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! paul2520 (talk) 15:24, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for National Paddy Day
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Rural municipalities of Achham District has been nominated for renaming
Category:Rural municipalities of Achham District has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pam D  12:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Rural municipalities of Gandaki Pradesh has been nominated for renaming
Category:Rural municipalities of Gandaki Pradesh has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pam D  12:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Mustang District
Thanks for the map transfer. Came here to ask if you know of any health data on the district that I can access. Is there any? Aditya (✉ • ⚒) 12:20, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Happy Bijaya Dashami!
Wishing you joy & happiness during this festive season. Happy Bada Dashain! CAPTAIN MEDUSA  talk  06:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of gaunpalikas of Nepal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aurahi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of gaunpalikas of Nepal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tripurasundari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khajura Bajaar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deputy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of gaunpalikas of Nepal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annapurna Rural Municipality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of gaunpalikas of Nepal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayadevi Rural Municipality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Map
Now done (see here), please tell me how you want it changed. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 15:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Birgunj, you may be blocked from editing. You have been on Wikipedia long enough to know you should NOT be making unsourced changes to statistics - not just at Birgunj, but at several other articles - Arjayay (talk) 12:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Check this page for the sources List of cities in Nepal. I am not editing anything without a source and you had to ask me sources before revert any article. I am editing with mobile so doing things one after one. Can you paste those sources there with reverted lines? One source is here but in Nepali language

Thanks 👤 Raju 💌 14:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Nepal municipality
Template:Infobox Nepal municipality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Raju Babu

Thank you for creating Inarwa railway station.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Janaki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Janaki Rural Municipality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Khumbu Pasanglhamu.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Khumbu Pasanglhamu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chudamani Acharya


A tag has been placed on Chudamani Acharya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MB 18:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Information.svg
Hello, I'm Helloimauser534. I noticed that you recently removed content from Moto G (2020) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Helloimauser534 (talk) 23:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moto G (2020). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Helloimauser534 (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC) Hohfohdhhdp (talk) 23:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)