User talk:Rajuiu

Welcome Rajuiu! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are registered editors!

Hello, Rajuiu. Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

 Sincerely, SUN EYE 1  05:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suneye1&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:WelcomeVisual/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Rt Rana (Announcer) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rt Rana (Announcer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi. Pages marked as "wiki" user-generated, so they are not reliable sources and can not be used. Primary documents from the government can't be used in biographies (WP:BLPPRIMARY). Blogs (including Blogspot.com) are also not usable on biographies (WP:BLPSPS). – Thjarkur (talk) 14:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rt Rana (November 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rt Rana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rt Rana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rt_Rana Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eternal_Shadow&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rt_Rana reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow  Talk  19:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:John Beddington has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Beddington. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:John Richard Beddington has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Richard Beddington. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Rt Rana has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rt Rana. Thanks!  DGG ( talk ) 17:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shama Mohamed (January 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shama Mohamed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shama Mohamed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shama_Mohamed Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jupitus_Smart&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shama_Mohamed reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Jupitus Smart  02:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rt Rana


A tag has been placed on Rt Rana, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RT Rana. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 14:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello Rajuiu. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Rt Rana, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rajuiu. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. signed,Rosguill talk 00:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Continuing from my talk page, can you please disclose whether or not you have ever received money for editing Wikipedia or have been in the employ of someone who directed you to edit Wikipedia as part of your employee duties? signed,Rosguill talk 00:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Dear   i didn't receive any money and who did not directed me to edit Wikipedia as part of employee duties .i proud to be a wikipedian .if i have free time i will do editing, and   i wont receive money for any Wikipedia editing in future because i think Wikipedia is a power ful web page , as well as i dont like non notable person article creation and also here in the future Rajuiu (talk) 10:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Dear    i didn't receive any money for Rt Rana article ,but  this is my first article as well as iam good radio listener  and iam  fan of rt rana so i interested that article  as well as  iam doing creation radio related articles such as contributing  ks raja and list of radio presenters its my own work, in future i will do , thanking you Rajuiu (talk) 10:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Dear   i like your question and i can truely say i won't create inappropriate article, only notable article only i will create in future.Rajuiu (talk) 12:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Dear   you are an admin you knows all, i think  don't need explain about rt rana article but i kindly request could you restore rt rana article , he is serving srilankan and indian government notable programs  thanks. Rajuiu (talk) 13:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not willing to restore the article. It had both neutrality and notability issues, and from reviewing your editing history I have concerns that you're not being entirely honest with your answers. Could you explain how you got started editing Wikipedia? signed,Rosguill talk 16:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Dear   iam honesty with you all time and in future and first i started editing wiki commons and  normally iam reading celebrates Wikipedia but some celebrates wiki peida is going afd so i read afd all .then i interest i want to be a good wikipeian so that i started eaditing wikipeia  Rajuiu (talk) 22:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I don't really understand what you were trying to say here. signed,Rosguill talk 23:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of radio presenters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brendan Jones. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Rt Rana for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rt Rana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rt Rana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —S Marshall T/C 10:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Dear   thanks could you restore  Rt Rana article talk page ? thanks Rajuiu (talk) 13:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Notice of sockpuppetry block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Rajuiu. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mz7 (talk) 21:16, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Richard Beddington (May 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Richard Beddington and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Richard Beddington, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:John_Richard_Beddington Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Scope_creep&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:John_Richard_Beddington reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 scope_creep Talk  00:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)