User talk:RakeshUpadhyay1

February 2024
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Drug interaction because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Material Science, I have added all genuine links from from US FDA sites, which is already part of your link. I had searched specific topic for citations and added in them.
 * Also, I had added trustworthy information that I have researched for my website related to Drug-Interactions. If you think they are not appropriate, you can guide me through but they are all genuine source. Am I not allowed to refer my well researched site? Please guide. RakeshUpadhyay1 (talk) 07:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * You are not allowed to add links to your own blog. Equine-man (talk) 20:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Understood and I have just responded to Wikipedia's communication below. I understood the policy now.
 * Thank you,
 * Rakesh RakeshUpadhyay1 (talk) 20:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Drug interaction, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. ''This is an unreliable blog. We use WP:MEDRS sources here.'' Zefr (talk) 15:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Understood and apologies for ignorance. My intention was to contribute to the content that I have researched in. Let me know if I am allowed to reference direct source the US FDA website and sections therein.
 * This was first attempt to understand the policy and contribute to the information, which is not available on Wikipedia. I have 28 years of industry experience, and the information available is not relevant to the industry professionals.
 * Let me know how I can contribute without violating any policy. Thank you. RakeshUpadhyay1 (talk) 20:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Certificate of analysis because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I have read the policy now. I would like to request unblocking. Reason: I thought this information is not available here, and based on pharmaceutical industry experience, I am able to contribute. Next time, I will only add government references, and not from my own site. RakeshUpadhyay1 (talk) 07:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 07:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * "your reason here"
 * Following are the reasons to unblock:
 * 1. I strongly believe that I am not spamming Wikipedia posts. Spamming definition = "Spamming is the use of electronic messaging systems like e-mails and other digital delivery systems and broadcast media to send unwanted bulk messages indiscriminately" I am neither sending mass emails via paid electronic system nor sending bulk emails for mass promotion.
 * I am genuinely reading posts, after careful research from different sources, I come up with consolidated information, which I post on Wikipedia. I am working towards posting best information with my efforts. I am also trying to work with Wikipedia team to resolve any technical issues, by a two-side dialogue. It is not considered a spam.
 * 2. Note that I work in the pharmaceutical industry for a long time for 28 years, and the edits are not related to to my work or employer. This is a personal level blog information. You should not judge me like a spammer.
 * 3. I also do believe that it is NOT a conflict of interest as I dont post any personal or disputed information. I compile information from different technical sources and write them as one source/piece of information for readers.
 * 4. Most information provided on technical pharmaceutical blog are created by SEO experts and they dont seem relevant to the industry professional, this is my observation here.
 * 5. I have seen multiple references to other external blog posts, and I am okay with it as far as everyone is given equal opportunity to post. eg. SafetyCulture and so many other references have their citations
 * 6. I am not here to promote my site, as this is not my business. If a mistake is made, you can remove my post, but I should not be blocked and considered a culprit/spammer.
 * 7. Also, note that I do not make multiple accounts and I dont have any other accounts, nor I have time/ nor I intent to do so. Please be considerate before framing a genuine person. If you would like to know my identity, I can send you my phone number and we can talk.
 * Please consider this request to unblock my account as I would like to genuinely contribute. Also, let me know the process of monitoring and approval. I am okay to work with team to send draft for approval before posting.
 * Thank you,
 * Rakesh Upadhyay RakeshUpadhyay1 (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Note that your intial statement should replace the words "your reason here" in your unblock request. I've fixed this for you. 331dot (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)