User talk:Rakhi65

In response to your feedback
Glad you're happy and welcome to Wikipedia! Please contribute information with a reliable source; see: WP:RS. If you need help editing, check out the tutorial or ask a question at the help desk

Ariconte (talk) 06:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

gramaticaly correcto inglés
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjktiKFLkxg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.51.145.113 (talk) 06:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Chittagong armoury raid has been reverted. Your edit here to Chittagong armoury raid was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Summer-of-1930/181204375236724) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Book addition
You appear to be adding a book to numerous articles. Is there any chance that you could format your addition, please? For example, it lacks an ISBN number. Assuming that it is an authoritative publication, I would suggest using:



which would result in:



Best wishes. - Sitush (talk) 06:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chittagong with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Although, upon review, I am not sure that this book should be in any article. It seems not to be cited by anyone of note and has a miserly 99 hits on Google, including the usual irrelevant Facebook etc. I think that you should probably remove it. If at some point in the future it does become recognised as authoritative then it can be reinstated. - Sitush (talk) 06:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Chittagong. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 06:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at History of Rajasthan, you may be blocked from editing. ''

I am sorry but you really must stop. The book is not authoritative and you have been spamming this & another one by the same author across numerous articles, including with Facebook links. It is not acceptable.'' Sitush (talk) 07:27, 20 February 2012 (UTC)