User talk:Ralikrak692

February 2019
Hello, I'm Þjarkur. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Amata Kabua, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''I do appreciate your edits, but you removed several sources in that article. You can still see your edit in the edit history, could you maybe redo it while keeping or adding citations? Thank you. – Þjarkur (talk)'' 14:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Amata Kabua wiki
The edits you re-installed are wrong. Whoever gave you those information sold you a punch of BS. The information you re-added have are false. Ralikrak692 (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I understand that the information might not have been correct, but you removed information that included sources and replaced it with unsourced information. I was just recommending that you added sources to your edit so that us other users can verify the information. If there isn't a source to cite, it's better to remove the section rather than to have unsourced information. I'm very grateful that you are helping us fixing incorrect information. – Þjarkur (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Amata Kabua wiki
The information i removed which you added aren't incorrect, they are false and misleading.

Amata was a corrupt leader who used his power has President to usurped the throne and lands of Kabua the Great who were supposed to be inherited by the children of his first born son who was Laelañ of the Ralik. Amatas adoptive father was Lõjelañ of the Ralik who was the son of Jeimata who was the 2nd son of Kabua the Great.

People can lose their lifes and their lands in the Marshall islands if they repeat the faulty information in here.

If anybody get killed because of the faulty informarion on this page it will be on you. Ralikrak692 (talk) 15:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I have not re-added the old information, I have only removed the parts of your edit that were needlessly contentious and added a [citation needed] tag. Please add a citation to a reliable source like I explained to you in my first message. – Þjarkur (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)