User talk:Ralph1975

BBC 6Music
Hi Ralph. I reverted your latest edit to BBC 6Music because the source suggests the same value test that the BBC applied to 6Music and BBC Asian Network was not applied to BBC Three. Even in the source there's nothing to indicate that the committee thought the test was unfair to 6Music. And the source is a blog. I tried to find a better source, or one that said what you suggested in your edit, but I couldn't. I don't think it's possible to include what the MPs said in the 6Music article and maintain a neutral point of view, especially as the closure section of the article is now much too heavily weighted in favour of the argument against closure. So I undid your edit. Hope this explains why. Alistair Stevenson (talk) 12:05, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Timothy Glanfield for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy Glanfield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Timothy Glanfield until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 22:52, 5 June 2018 (UTC)