User talk:RalphWinwood

Welcome!
Hello, RalphWinwood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Johnuniq (talk) 10:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sir Henry Neville theory of Shakespeare Authorship for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sir Henry Neville theory of Shakespeare Authorship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sir Henry Neville theory of Shakespeare Authorship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#124; Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 07:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification
Ian.thomson (talk) 00:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Nevillian theory of Shakespeare authorship
Your ill-thought comments at Articles for deletion/Sir Henry Neville theory of Shakespeare Authorship have caused me to switch from keep to userfy. You would do well to make more effort to learn Wikipedia editing and spend less time arguing with other editors. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 15:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

NPOV
"To your point about "neutrality", I've declared my POV for this candidate, but I'd have to call a foul on your comments. I Googled "Tom Reedy Shakespeare" and after an hour or so following links found literally volumes of Tom Reedy comment all opposing the questioning of Shakespeare's authorship."

You really need to read up on Wikipedia policy, most especially [WP:NPOV]]. Neutrality has nothing to do with my stance on the SAQ, or yours either. It refers to the way an article is written. An article should be a report, not try to make a case. Tom Reedy (talk) 13:13, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions about Shakespeare authorship
EdJohnston (talk) 00:55, 24 December 2019 (UTC)