User talk:Ralphfurley

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dan Lashley has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://bannedofbrothers.proboards.com (matching the regex rule \bproboards\.com\b). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:38, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dan Lashley, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dan Lashley was changed by Ralphfurley (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-10-19T18:38:12+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:38, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://bannedofbrothers.proboards.com (matching the regex rule \bproboards\.com\b). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added  do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the  before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://bannedofbrothers.proboards.com (matching the regex rule \bproboards\.com\b). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added  do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the  before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

 You have been blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Appealing a block. Daniel Case (talk) 17:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia's deletion process works very well. But you weren't using Wikipedia's deletion process. Our process is to tag for speedy deletion articles that are unquestionably non-notable, or simple vandalism, and to discuss articles that aren't so obvious, letting the community search for sources that would allow us to keep any given article. You were just repeatedly using speedy-deletion tags on articles that were not candidates for speedy deletion, and not trying Wikipedia's deletion process. Your edits also have an odd pattern which makes me think there's something personal happening that I don't quite understand; unfortunately, you haven't participated in any discussions that would help me understand that. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)


 * "Irrelevant" to what? What makes Dan Lashey 'relevant?'  Is he a friend of yours?  Your stepfather?  Did he kill your puppy? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

I don't have a vendetta against anybody, but I thought the point of Wikipedia was to have pages about notable people and obviously Dan Lashley is not notable.
 * That didn't really answer my question. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Ralphfurley is a member of a message board that attacks people from another forum for the simple fact that they were banned there. Lashley has done nothing to have Ralphfurley post links and associate LAshley with people such as Ted Bundy and Chris Beniot. The user simply wishes to delete the page in some sort of minor "victory" and in some ways is quite sad.Dinero Banner (talk) 15:48, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * So this is just overflow from interpersonal conflicts on a message board? That's entirely non-helpful here, and has nothing to do with writing an encyclopedia. If what you say is true, then the indefinite block is a very good idea. There's no reason for message-board conflicts to expand outside the message board. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:52, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes. That is why they posted the link to the messageboard time and time again on the page. It is pure vandelism.Dinero Banner (talk) 15:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC)