User talk:Ralts 465

Speedy deletion of Nuclear energy advanteges
A tag has been placed on Nuclear energy advanteges, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justin Eiler (talk) 18:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Little context in Nuclear energy across the globe
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nuclear energy across the globe, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nuclear energy across the globe is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nuclear energy across the globe, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Hints
- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The word is "advantage"
 * It is probably better to improve existing articles than create new essays
 * If you really think a new article is needed, develop it in user:Ralts 465/sandbox until it is of a viable size.