User talk:Ram2006~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Multiculturalism is a disaster and genocide. --Ram2006 14:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Oral Sex
Please stop making disruptive edits to Oral Sex. Reviewing WP:NOT you will see that WP is neither censored, nor a soapbox where any one editor's views or sensitivies supercede others. David Spalding ( ☎   ✉   ✍  ) 02:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:RM2006_010.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RM2006_010.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom murder
Please use the talk page to discuss changes to the article, rather than just inserting material without consensus. It's disruptive, and makes it difficult to work on a good article. --Haemo 03:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I did not start any reverting war. I made a valid change, you reverted it.--Ram2006 03:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I did not revert a "valid change" -- this has been discussed on the talk page; you've decided not to honor that consensus. --Haemo 03:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Sourcing
Could you please support all your strong statements by sources, especially with regard to statistical data, such as 15 millions of illegal immigrants in Russsia, etc? It is very important to follow WP:SOURCE policy. Thanks. Biophys 20:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Furthermore, it is totally inappropriate to delete sources that satisfy WP:SOURCE, like you just did . This may be considered vandalism. Please respect work of other people.Biophys 20:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism and spamming warning
In this edit you deleted reliable sources and inserted youtube propaganda spam. Please do not do this again. Such incidents has to be reported to WP administrators.00:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * First, sign you messages. Second, I removed rusophobic propaganda links to fringe racist site. The videos are authentic. --Ram2006 14:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:SOURCE and other WP policies. Any spam is "authentic". You have been warned.Biophys 15:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * This is your last warning. Do not do this:Biophys 21:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I have noticed that you left a message accusing other editors in vandalism. In fact removing unsourced biased statements and original research does not constitute vandalism. On the other hand false accusation of others in vandalism constitutes personal attack and may make you blocked (as correctly mentioned by User:Biophys). It makes sense to familiarize yourself with the basic policies of Wikipedia: It is not that I try to impress you with my knowledge of this alphabet soup, these are basic policies you have violated recently. It is worth to familiarize yourself with them so not to violate them the next time.
 * WP:V
 * WP:RS
 * WP:ATT
 * WP:NOR
 * WP:NPOV
 * WP:SOAP
 * WP:VAND
 * WP:CIV
 * WP:NPA

If you want to critisize SOVA Center remember that our own personal opinions worth nothing in Wikipedia (they belongs to personal blogs). Thus, find notable sources (large newspapers, academic publications, etc.) and put (Some notable guy) stated that SC is russophobic organization only pretending to be NGO. If some info is an unchallenged fact (e.g. Ganushkina was accused by a court with such and such sentence). You can put the info in the article as a fact, but not forget the sources. As a rule let facts talk by themselves rather putting strong words and various spins. Allow all the notable opinions to be shown in the article.

Happy editing and please follow the best examples Alex Bakharev 01:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thus, find notable sources (large newspapers, academic publications, etc.) and put (Some notable guy) stated that SC is russophobic organization only pretending to be NGO - who appointed a guy to be notable? Who decided which source is notable? Let me see: if in a town A run by mafia, where all TV, press, courts, government officials and businesses are controlled by that mafia, how can anybody who contradicts the mafia's point of view be even given a voice in public podium. And because one cannot express his opinion in notable sources, so one cannot be referenced in any article, one cannot be deemed a notable expert, and therefore one's truthful opinion may not be accepted as valid, because it is not notable, in the town A run by the mafia. You know where this is going? This is going towards a massive revolt by people, because those who voice their opinion are not notable, because they are opposed to the mafia that runs the town. --Ram2006 02:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ta-gg-baldwinpark1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ta-gg-baldwinpark1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 02:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ta-gg-bp-f-thealamo.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ta-gg-bp-f-thealamo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 02:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ta-gg-bp-terrorost2.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ta-gg-bp-terrorost2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 02:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Request for comment
Dear Ram2006: A request for comment regarding your edits at Internal Revenue Code has been initiated at Talk:Tax protester statutory arguments. You are welcome to participate in that discussion. Yours, Famspear (talk) 02:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Ram2006. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Ram2006~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:17, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:56, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Marine Park, Brooklyn racial attack for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marine Park, Brooklyn racial attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marine Park, Brooklyn racial attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Herostratus (talk) 15:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:RussianMarch06-StPetersburg.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RussianMarch06-StPetersburg.jpg, which you've attributed to http://zvezda.ru/politics/2006/11/18/rusmarsh.htm. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 21:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)