User talk:Ram4eva

{{void|/Archive 1

Sam Allardyce
I was just wondering what your reasons were for removing the 'nickname' attribute from the Sam Allardyce infobox? Is the nickname attribute deprecated, as I thought it was widely used? Is there any guideline or discussion on this? Surely the words "Big Sam" should appear somewhere in the article though?? Cheers.

Wembley here we come :-)

--Jameboy 21:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Please ignore the above, I think I see now. As I understand it, the nickname attribute seems to have been removed from Template:Infobox Football biography following a discussion. Not sure if a bot will clean this up, but I guess I will remove it where I see it, and if a nickname is especially notable and/or referenced, add it into the article proper. Might be worth putting a note on article talk pages when doing so, as I notice someone reverted your change already. --Jameboy 21:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 18:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Park taven cinderhill
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Park taven cinderhill, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Park taven cinderhill is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Park taven cinderhill, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Park taven cinderhill itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Shame you've gone
It looks like you did some work. Maybe you'll return or do as an IP. 86.141.139.173 15:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC). }}

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Nathan Winder for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Winder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nathan Winder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 17:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)