User talk:RamanujaDasa

Welcome!

Hello, RamanujaDasa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Ramanuja does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or,   to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Abecedare (talk) 15:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

July 2015
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:46, 9 July 2015 (UTC) What do you mean by promotional material? Be specific?

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:52, 9 July 2015 (UTC) What? Who is doing the disruptive editing? Btw, who are you to make these changes? on what authority you are making these changes? Pl don't threaten for the disruptive editing you are making?
 * Let's be clear, Wikipedia is not a fansite, nor is it a repository for content such as you are including. This is an encyclopaedia and such content does not belong here. If you continue to treat this as a repository for content that is nothing more than advertorial or soapboxing in nature, you will be blocked. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:56, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

What? Who is using this as a fan page? What content is causing trouble to you? Be specific and don't make too many unknown changes and add your own content. If you try to distort the information of a person, we may have proceed legally. Pl don't misuse the power.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Neil N  talk to me 14:04, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

You were blocked for this legal threat. You will have to explicitly retract it in order to get unblocked. --Neil N  talk to me 14:26, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chinna Jeeyar Swamy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Stuff like "highly esteemed line of monks" and calling the minor cult leader "His Holiness Sri Chinna Jeeyar Swamy" is obviously not neutral. '' —  Wasell ( T ) 09:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC) It is laughable that you are lecturing on NPV. The comment you made comes under that category. By putting wrong statement on a person, you are violating wikipedia's Defamation policy. Check the facts before making an assertion. You comment shows your hat-redness rather than a policy you are mentioning.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. ''You've been warned and counseled multiple times, yet you do not seem to understand or want to follow the rules and guidelines of the encyclopaedia. If you continue to add your personal opinions to articles or do not adhere to our neutrality guidelines, you will be blocked.'' &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  11:09, 11 July 2015 (UTC) what? What is the big problem with you guys? Who are you? How come you become a volunteer with such a hatredness on a particular person and religion. You are putting wrong facts. You should be blocked not me. It is against wikipedia's guideliness of WP;Libel and WP:WIKIHATE.

Hello User_talk:SpacemanSpiff Why are you putting your personal opinion on this page against wikipedia policy personal analysis. But putting wrong facts, it is against our policies Libel. It seems like your continued to perform abruptive behavior against a highly noted person is also against wikipedia policy of WIKIHATE. You are been warned considerable times but still pursue against wikipedia's policy. If you continue to add your personal opinions to articles or do not adhere to our neutrality guidelines, you will be reported for block.''

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:02, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported has not have engaged in vandalism. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and a content dispute in good faith. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:33, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for looking into it. Why do you say it is not WP:VANDAL. It clearly says "inserting obvious nonsense into a page" is a cause for WP:VANDAL. THIS is what these users are doing by modifying the facts. It is against Wikipedia:NPOV.

Chinna Jeeyar Swamy
If you have issues with the article content, discuss it calmly on the article page with sources and establish consensus for the change, instead of edit warring. Also while you have been already informed about wikipedia's policy against legal threats, you should be aware that linking to WP:LIBEL instead is not a get-out-of-the-jail-free-card to circumvent that policy; please stop making such accusations and base your arguments on wikipedia policies of sources and neutral point of view. Finally, if is you, take note of wikipedia's policy on sock-puppetry and don't edit-war using alternate accounts or while logged-out. Abecedare (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. Again I am damn confused with Different people with different userids keeping responding to me. First of all, when you guys are accusing me of doing something wrong, which I am not, how come the edits that were made do not come under WP:NPOV. You are cautioning me with edit warring. but where were you when those wrong edits were made without been calmly discussed at the article page. The reason I included WP:Libel is because, it is clearly mentioned in the wikipedia's policy about writing wrong on a living person comes under WP:Libel. It is clearly stated AS " This biographical article needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous or harmful. (May 2015)". The edits that were made by me at this article page is directly referring the official web page at http://www.chinnajeeyar.guru and the edits made by THE Friends are directly contradicting to this. Instead of looking at the truth, why do I receive threats of blocking. Again, you are assuming that that IP address is of mine, where in I see a pattern of different users responding to my questions and continue to ignore the non-geniality of the edits made to this page. I know you guys have power but I hope it is not been abused for wrong doings. Consensus happens to information that is factual. But not to a decretory remarks by some ill-informed users and mis-representing wikipedia's policies.

ARBIPA notification
High standards in following Wikipedia policies are indeed expected of all editors editing India/Pakistan/Afghanistan pages. All the best! - Kautilya3 (talk) 20:07, 11 July 2015 (UTC) Lol at User:Kautilya3 A big brother indeed. why only high standards to be followed by the editors of those pages. Why not others? The Racism is widely spread across wikipedia. It is very sad to see. Dudes, wikipedia is not a country nor a social network. People write crap and wikipedia recruits them to protect it. Sad to see the abuse of power. Why is it at my talk page? Please publish to those users who are abusing the wikipedia.

July 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Chinna Jeeyar, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ogress smash! 07:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Neil N  talk to me 10:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Given your complete inability to approach this topic from a neutral point of view and I didn't hear that attitude I have blocked you for one week. When the block expires, you should probably stay away from editing Chinna Jeeyar. --Neil N  talk to me</i> 11:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ogress <sub style="color:#BA55D3;">smash! 17:08, 12 July 2015 (UTC)