User talk:Rameenj

Welcome!

Hello Rameenj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BhaiSaab talk 04:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

29 Sep 2006
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Islam. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! -Patstuart 03:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to the Islam article
First and formost, I thank you for trying to help. However, the edits you made are in violation of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. your text which you attempted to put in the article was this:

''The Ahmadiyya Muslim Community in Islam was created under divine guidance with the objective to rejuvenate Islamic moral and spiritual values. It encourages interfaith dialogue, and diligently defends Islam and tries to correct misunderstandings about Islam in the West. It advocates peace, tolerance, love and understanding among followers of different faiths. It firmly believes in and acts upon the Qur'anic teaching: "There is no compulsion in religion." (2:257) It strongly rejects violence and terrorism in any form and for any reason.''

That is not a neutral point of view for several reasons. One, it states that Ahmadis received divine guidance. Two, it assumes that Islamic moral and spiritual values need to be rejuvinated. Three, it assumes that Ahmadis are Muslim. This is false. Ahmadis are an extreme minority in the Islamic world and they are not considered Muslims. Fourth, it is verse 2:256 which states that there is no compulsion in religion. Amd fifth, its rejection of violence in any form and for any reason is not Islamic and contradicts the rest of the article which explains that Muslims believe that violence is justified in the case of self-defense. I hope you consider these points I have made and why I do not think your passage belongs in the article. Thank you. -- Ķĩřβȳ ♥  Ťįɱé  Ø  03:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)