User talk:Ramny


 * This is a checkuser block, so this will require a checkuser to comment on. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

The connection between Ramny and Middlecountry is very clear (as one would expect, given Ramny's statement above. In terms of a connection with Madheshi123, the two accounts use the same ISP (but not IP address), geolocate to the same area, and have the same useragent data. Against that, I would add that the ISP is a very popular one in their country, with well over 100 million subscribers, and the useragent data suggests a very common PC setup. On balance, my personal opinion is that the reviewing administrator should not attach too much weight to the technical evidence in this case. Yunshui 雲 水 12:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I note that the User:Madheshi123 account was created before Ramny was blocked so it was not made for block evasion. Is there technical evidence confirming the sock relationship? If so then endof. However, if there is not then I am inclined to give the benefit of the doubt and request the checkuserblock element be removed. Just Chilling (talk) 02:47, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * blocked with a "checkuser block" and tagged their user page with a tag that says "This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sock puppet of Ramny" . So, I guess there is technical evidence confirming the sock relationship.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  15:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The notice also says "the operator has abusively used multiple accounts" and I am not seeing the abusive use. I would still like the checkuserblock removed or hear from Bbb23 what I am missing. Just Chilling (talk) 17:40, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Using two accounts to edit the same page is disruptive per WP:ILLEGIT.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:58, 7 August 2017 (UTC)