User talk:Ramon Lull

February 2017
Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Metascience. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should: Thank you. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
 * Only add a " red link " if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references

Please stop changing the disambiguation page. Disambiguation pages aren't placeholders for articles, they are created purposefully, please see WP:DAB. If you'd like to create it as a Broad-concept article please draft it first and then discuss it. There is no sense in undoing a disambiguation when there is no BCA. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Metascience (research) has been accepted
 Metascience (research), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  21:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.