User talk:Ramotrading

Welcome!
Hello, Ramotrading, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Ramotrading, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Valdemar2018 (talk) 15:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ramotrading


A tag has been placed on User:Ramotrading, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Valdemar2018 (talk) 15:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your feedback.
 * My edits included promotional content which was advertising a company, also the username was wrong because it represent our website name.
 * My knowledge about wiki was very little, I was in interest of creating a page about our company success, not for promotional reasons but for building more valuable info about how the company was founded and to also have a better SEO presence.
 * I copied and pasted our about us page info because i'm not a professional content writer.
 * Kindly all I need is to create a page that follows the wiki guidelines and provide valuable information about us.
 * Thank you Ramotrading (talk) 19:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * "better SEO presence" is the same thing as promotion. You will not be unblocked to write about your company.
 * A company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists; this isn't a business directory. A company must meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable company to be considered worthy of an inclusion. This requires a company to have already acquired significant coverage from a variety of reliable sources that are independent of the company. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * BTW MR.Drm310, thank you for your advice but yes in your opinion our company is not worthy, but you have 0 knowledge about our worth and value , same as I had 0 knowledge if wiki policies. at the end some individuals can't change the real fact of how worthy we are.
 * Thank you Ramotrading (talk) 20:05, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * When I mean seo presence I meant by when people want to find organic real information about our company like all other companies that are listed in wikipedia, google is showing on the right side a small brief information and link to wiki article , that what i meant.
 * Again I have no intended to use the article or the page for any promotions or advertisements
 * I'm just trying to build strong real information about the company with no intend of any violations
 * I hope i was able to express myself better at the end i'm a normal guy trying to build a wikipage
 * Thank you Ramotrading (talk) 19:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Improving your company's search engine results and ranking is promotion. You won't be allowed to do this here, and that is non-negotiable.
 * You are not capable of being an objective judge of your own company's notability. That is why we gauge a company's notability by the coverage it has received from third-party sources, not the people who have a personal or financial interest in it.
 * Admins may consider your unblock request if you will agree to edit other topics that are unrelated to your company. However, if your only interest is to write about your company, then your time on Wikipedia is over. Please find an alternative outlet that permits this type of writing. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Well i dont care about this account you can block it, at the end you have 0 knowledge what is SEO it is something organic, i will not discuss this with a very limited information, stay in your little world , I know about science , biotech and MED .. all you know is your good at is writing content only. so go ahead close my account i'm not honored to be in a platform where discussions are managed by shallow people.
 * Good luck in your little screen world Ramotrading (talk) 20:14, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * It's disappointing that you responded to friendly (and correct) advice with personal attacks(which are not permitted). If you want to tell the world about your company, you should do that on your company website and social media. Wikipedia is interested in what others say about your company, not what it says about itself. I get (and would hope) that you think your company is important and notable, but what matters here is if others think it is. Please read WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 22:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * it is unfortunate this platform is attacking my response and killing my voice. now I understand why the world is not okay, because we have writers who only wants their voice to be heard.
 * I will make sure to screen shot the writers response and share my voice about this experience somewhere els
 * non of you guys supported me you guys directly cut off my voice and pressed your opinions, and for sharing my voice you guys accuse me attacking you guys !!
 * No more necessary discussion is needed when you guys do not want to hear the voice of the people. Ramotrading (talk) 22:59, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You gravely misunderstand Wikipedia- this is not a free speech platform. This is an encyclopedia with criteria for inclusion. Just as you can determine what is said and done within the four walls of your residence, Wikipedia can determine what content appears on its computers. There  are other platforms where you can say as you wish if that is what you want to do.  Wikipedia is not interested in enhancing search results for your company- only in our notability criteria for companies as well as conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 23:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Again you guys are writers and I don't know how you guys dont understand your platform
 * I'm did not request to make my page a free talk, you guys brought me to this comment section which you guys built in your platform for " COMMENTS" and again you do not want the voice of the comment to resolve issue to help build a better community.
 * Second of all i did not say four walls and your residence, i dont know where you brought this , i'm glad you are faking my talking and manipulating my words, this is a great screen shot, yeah so please read what i said carefully before you can audit articles and approve it
 * What i said " stay in your little world "
 * You guys really made my day and made me laugh, I thought i was discussing with professional writers XD Ramotrading (talk) 23:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I was drawing an analogy to make the point that Wikipedia determines what content appears here. No, we are not professional writers, we are volunteer editors who participate here because we believe in this project to write an encyclopedia of human knowledge. You are the one who said your voice is being silenced- that is not true, but even if it were, this is not a free speech platform where you may say anything you wish.  331dot (talk) 23:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I would add that we don't have "pages" here, we have articles. This is an important distinction. 331dot (talk) 22:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I never want to use Wikipedia for improving search results, I can't trust this platform
 * Second If i thought of something in my head does not mean I want to imply it and enforce it to WIKIPEDIA, i may have a question ? and it is the platform responsibility to answer, listen and help the user to post a approved article, not just say oh you are thinking of that then bye you are out of here
 * well I dont need your platform and I totally lost respect and interest for this platform where voice is being silenced, by replying to me and faking that the voice is not being silence is not enough, because my experience and the comment log is enough to share the screen shot all over the social media and internet to show the world what is really going on in this platform.
 * I'm sure you have seen the news about twitter they silenced many voices and now they are being exposed, well that is what is happening here but we need to bring attention and eye of the people to dig and audit
 * You guy were helpful to expose this platform how the editors are shallow, and silence the voice the people to match your opinion, i'm wondering how many articles you guys edited to silence voices. Ramotrading (talk) 23:34, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You aren't saying anything the world doesn't already know. Do you allow visitors to your home to say whatever they wish? Do you have rules in your home? 331dot (talk) 23:44, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Come on stop manipulating the situation again, I have never enforced or pressed my articles to be published. !!!
 * I was asked what was my mistakes, i explained my mistakes to show you guys I understand your policy and i recognize what is wrong, then I dont know who popped out and kicked me out just because I had some thoughts about whatever and I got my answer, but that does not mean to directly judge me and say we will block anything related to your company because you have thought in your mind about maybe this platform can benefit me in organic search results. well you have no right on earth to judge a question in my question and kick me out.
 * Second if this is your home I dont want this home which is making the world worst providing manipulated information
 * My rules at home if i have a visitor to respect him and be nice to him, I never kick out my visitor just because of some questions or thoughts in their head because of lake of platform guideline knowledge, so that proofs you guys judge people silence them if you dont like what they say or think in their head.
 * You want to help me, where is the help ! by the way I can buy a wiki article service paid for thousands of dollars and post my article matching your guidelines if i want, but I logged in today to check and try to do it on my own respecting the guidelines of the platform , found the block , tried to response, and here we are here now , and If I pay money to buy the wiki article this is why you silence people here this way, everything got a price and this conversation is being edited to get posted on tiktok soon Ramotrading (talk) 23:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * We want to help you participate here if you want to do so according to our rules. 331dot (talk) 23:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Ponyo bons mots 23:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:16, 15 December 2022 (UTC)