User talk:Ramyraoof

Welcome!

 * }

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.flickr.com/photos/eipr (redirect from http://flickr.com/EIPR). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nazra for Feminist Studies


A tag has been placed on Nazra for Feminist Studies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ... disco spinster   talk  02:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Nazra for Feminist Studies
Hi there. The main reason it was deleted is because it did not indicate the importance or significance of the group. Articles in Wikipedia must show how the group is notable; i.e., that it's been significantly covered in multiple reliable sources.

A further reason is that it was directly copied from http://nazra.org/en/about-us, which, although it's covered by a Creative Commons licence, is only licensed for non-commercial use. Wikipedia on the other hand is covered by CC-BY-SA, which does not include the NC (non-commercial) limitation. So if you copied it directly to Wikipedia, it could be used in a way that the organization does not permit, and that's a legal issue for Wikipedia. If you look at the page WP:DCM it explains how the text can be permitted for use here. Alternatively you could re-write the article in your own words, making sure to show how the organization is notable. Hope this helps, ... disco spinster  talk  22:36, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nazra for Feminist Studies Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Nazra for Feminist Studies Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)