User talk:Ranaajeetpratap

December 2011
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Kamaal Rashid Khan. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Your addition to Kamaal Rashid Khan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Bbb23 (talk) 16:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Do not add misrepresent your edits in edit summaries. Your edit summary to the Kamaal Rashid Khan article was grossly misleading.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Your addition to Digvijay Singh (politician) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: Talk:Sanjay Pathak (politician)
Sorry, the template you used is to request an edit to a page that is already semi-protected. You would need to file the request at Requests for page protection for Sanjay Pathak (politician), which may take some time. Dru of Id (talk) 10:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

I also was taken to that page because of the tag you placed. Dru of Id is correct that requesting page protection would be the correct procedure. However, I noticed that the page was already protected after a lot of vandalism, and that protection expired Feb 1st. I don't see any vandalism since that date, so admins may be reluctant to protect it again if there is no current vandalism problem. Begoon &thinsp; talk 09:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)