User talk:Ranaweeram

Why are you guys trying to remove this? ebdex is a company one way or another. You are welcome to revise the text, as some one already have tidied it. But for speedy deletion...wonder why? We are no different to other SaaS players or EIPP players for that matter. Please do e-mail info@ebdex.co.uk if you have any issues about this post.
 * The proper way to resurrect an article is to take it to Deletion review. Please note the following policies and guidelines:


 * Notability
 * Verifiability
 * Notability (companies and corporations)
 * Neutral point of view
 * Criteria for speedy deletion
 * Deletion policy


 * You don't need to read every single word, just skim through it to get a good idea. You'll also need consensus in the deletion review for recreation. Also, people can talk to you on your talk page. And please sign your comments using four tildes ( ~ ). --WikiSlasher 10:33, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh and it doesn't end there; I also found Undeletion policy. (Yes I'm aware of the mass of confusing rules, sorry about that.) --WikiSlasher 10:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. Will try to find time to read above. I followed a very simple rule, i.e. if another company can have a page, then we should have the same right. Examples, Ariba and Twinfield. If it's the content that you are disagreeing with, please amend. I thought I was more qualified to speak about ebdex than anyone else...(Ranaweeram 11:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC))
 * Nobody has a right to an article. And your use of the word "we" indicates that you work for the subject company, which raises conflict of interest issues. Every article needs to demonstrate significance per the corporate article guidelines; if you feel that your competitors do not meet those guidelines then you may nominate those articles for deletion, but beware that you might be accused of disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. Guy 11:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)