User talk:RandJshow

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:02, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi,

I received a message that my contributions were removed. I'm not sure why because I referenced it from a reliable source that doesn't sell anything. Also, I'm working on creating a page for "David After Dentist", which is a major viral video that doesn't have a Wikipedia page yet. I don't want to finish it and find out it can't be posted. Can you let me know if I did anything wrong?

RandJshow (talk) 23:29, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You posted two links to "101 reasons to," which does not meet WP:WEB notability guidelines. For an article about a viral video to be accepted here, you'll need non-trivial coverage from third-paty reliable sources (e.g., major news sites) describing the video as viral. Number of Google hits and number of youtube views is not sufficient. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 23:41, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Iteya.com
A tag has been placed on Iteya.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bonewah (talk) 21:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Iteya.com
I have nominated Iteya.com, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Iteya.com. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bonewah (talk) 14:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Peer review of Russel Hantz
Peer review is not the place for entire draft articles, it is for articles in article space that are of decent quality to start with. I have moved the draft to User:RandJshow/Hantz for now and closed the PR Peer review/Russell hantz/archive1. I can tell you that the draft contains no (zero) references and needs them to prove notability. The article also reads like a fan club page now - it goes into way too much detail. Please see WP:NOT (Wikipedia is not a digest of the plot of a tv show) and WP:Your first article. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 17:59, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

You have new messages
Waiting for you at the Help Desk. Warm regards.  ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪    ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  04:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:45, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:RandJshow/Hantz
User:RandJshow/Hantz, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:RandJshow/Hantz and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:RandJshow/Hantz during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:RandJshow/sandbox
User:RandJshow/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:RandJshow/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:RandJshow/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of David After Dentist for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David After Dentist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David After Dentist & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)