User talk:Randall1190

California elections, November 2012
I don't know why you changed my use of "Initiative" back to "Initiated", but the latter is not a word that is used anywhere in California that I'm aware of. The usual term, including in voter information pamphlets, is "Initiative Statute" or "Initiative Constitutional Amendment."

I'm going give you an opportunity to reply before I change it back to the correct wording, simply because I don't want to get into an edit war. But I live in California and have voted in every primary and general election since 1968, when I first became old enough to vote. Do you even live in California? Do you know anything about the terminology used in California elections? Bgoldnyxnet (talk) 20:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I am not sure whose "talk" page I should reply on, so I will do both. I did not change initiative back to initiated. The original phrase was initiated state statute, which redirected to the initiative page. I had no issue with your change, except that when you made your change the link no longer worked. I only removed the word "state", as it seemed redundant for a page on a California election, and then added the brackets to link initiative and statute to their respective pages. This is the current text in question: initiative statute. As you can see it is still initiatIVE and not initiatED. If this didn't answer your question, please let me know.

Thanks

p.s. I almost forgot... as I agreed with your change, I also changed the two initiated constitutional amendment to read initiative constitutional amendment. The later redirects to initiative, but the former has it's own page. This also seems redundant as constitutional amendments are covered along with statutes on the initiative page.

Nomination of MaryRose Occhino for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MaryRose Occhino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/MaryRose Occhino until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)