User talk:RandoUsername

July 2017
Please don't make comments such as you did in your edit summary at Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 30. That log is just to list the articles up for deletion. Your opinions don't belong there. And they don't belong in the AFD Articles for deletion/Gurmukh (yoga teacher) either. Two of your points were completely irrelevant to a deletion discussion ( Sikhism and the name of her child), and one of them (no reliable sources) was incorrect, and would not have been a valid reason for deletion even if correct. It's not whether there are any reliable sources in the article but whether any exist that is important. Your fourth claim (promotional article) I dispute.

See WP:BEFORE You are supposed to present valid reasons for deletion and look for sources before you nominate something. Meters (talk) 23:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC)


 * This is the third really third bad AFD nomination you have made. This is getting disruptive. Meters (talk) 23:37, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurmukh (yoga teacher) while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. And on my talk page Meters (talk) 23:47, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurmukh (yoga teacher). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. And my talk page. Meters (talk) 23:49, 30 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Please remove the personal attacks you made using your IP. And stay off my talk page. I will consider any further posts by you on my page to be vandalism. This applies to both your named account and the IP you used to attack me. Meters (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. And for this edit in particular. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 01:54, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

I bet was hoping I would never find this eh, ?

It's deleted for good reason; the same one Binksternet's duplicitous conduct was hinting at: Scott Storch being Canadian changes EVERYTHING. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RandoUsername (talk • contribs)


 * Still pushing the Canadian hoax, eh? Your link shows nothing new. It's basically this article written by the Associated Press in July 2008 and published in a bunch of newspapers. In the original AP text, there's nothing about being born in Nova Scotia. And this is the same article as the CBS version which we already show in the Scott Storch biography as an example of the media getting it wrong. CBS went to Wikipedia at the time and saw the hoax in place, so they repeated it because of lazy journalism. Your Canadian Press link is yet another example of this lazy journalism. Once again I will point you to XKCD for a graphic explanation.
 * Since you insist on the hoax, I am certain your indefinite block should not be lifted. Binksternet (talk) 21:10, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Um,, are you able to read? You've shown issues with comprehension many times, and I see it has come up yet again. This article was published *before* the CBS one (16 July 2008 vs 18 July 2008). You continually grasp at straws, and it is rather sad. You have attacked me multiple times and it is obvious the administrators would like to give me another chance, but a low-quality contributor who compensates with volume, is hard to find these days given the sort of conduct by people like yourself. Did you even see the date on the article? Or are you just in denial? It was written by Evelyn McDonnell, too.

So not only is this article published before the CBS article, thereby making the CBS article a rehash of Mrs. Evelyn McDonnell's, it is also the TRUTH and you keep attacking me without basis. I wish administrators would do something about you.

ANyways here is the link is here. I would like to upload this to wikipedia but I am blocked, thereby preventing me from sharing this extremely important information RandoUsername (talk)


 * Stop pinging me. I'm done dealing with your hoaxing. Binksternet (talk) 04:06, 3 October 2019 (UTC)