User talk:Randoelin11/sandbox

Peer Review
Great article choice! This article could definitely use more information. The first thing I noticed that isn't part of your plan is that the article could use more pictures. It also appears that there are only a few sources that were drawn from for this information. I know it's probably difficult to find verifiable information on Holmes, but it is definitely something to strive for if you can. The training said to try to cite at least once per paragraph but there are only two citations so far on the article. Other than that, great job! I think the subject you chose is awesome and I look forward to seeing what you add! Hthrxlynn (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Response to Peer Review
I had not thought about adding pictures when I initially wrote up my plan, but I think that may be a good idea since there is only one on the article. Also, I'm trying to find any more sources out there that talk about Hamilton Holmes. It's been a little tough to find some, but hopefully I can find at least 2-3 more. Thank you for your input! I'll definitely take it into consideration when I write up the final draft. Randoelin11 (talk) 22:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)